Re: [MMUSIC] ICE-SIP-SDP: Concluding ICE statement

Hi Christer,

This makes sense, but I am not sure it is precise enough. What we are
trying to say is that ICE nomination process is done (completed or failed)
for all streams and no new candidate pairs are going to be nominated.

Do you know if there is a simpler way to say this?

Best Regards,
_____________
Roman Shpount

On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 10:30 AM Christer Holmberg <
christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
>
>
> I realized the following when taking a look at draft-ice-sip-sdp after
> having worked on draft-ice-pac the last few days:
>
>
>
> Section 3.3.4 says:
>
>
>
>   “Once the state of each check list is Completed, and if the agent is
>
>    the controlling agent, it nominates a candidate pair [RFC8445] and
>
>    checks for each data stream whether the nominated pair matches the
>
>    default candidate pair.”
>
>
>
> This is not necessarily true. An agent can nominate even if one or more
> check list is Failed, based on whether the agent wants to establish a
> session without the streams associated with the failed check lists.
>
>
>
> So, perhaps something like:
>
>
>
>   “Once the state of enough check lists is Completed, and if the agent is
>
>    the controlling agent, it nominates a candidate pair [RFC8445] for each
>
>    Completed check list. In addition, for each Completed check list the
> agent
>
>    checks whether the nominated pair matches the default candidate pair of
>
>    that check list. If there are one or more check lists without a match,
> and
>
>   the peer did not…”
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Christer
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mmusic mailing list
> mmusic@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic
>