Re: [MMUSIC] New version draft-ietf-mmusic-data-channel-sdpneg-04

Christian Groves <Christian.Groves@nteczone.com> Tue, 11 August 2015 01:33 UTC

Return-Path: <Christian.Groves@nteczone.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C38F81A8888 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 18:33:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 57G8GHPxXZLo for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 18:33:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cserver5.myshophosting.com (cserver5.myshophosting.com [175.107.161.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC76D1A8883 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 18:33:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ppp118-209-62-144.lns20.mel4.internode.on.net ([118.209.62.144]:51812 helo=[192.168.1.22]) by cserver5.myshophosting.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from <Christian.Groves@nteczone.com>) id 1ZOyR2-003gBB-Jt for mmusic@ietf.org; Tue, 11 Aug 2015 11:33:00 +1000
To: mmusic@ietf.org
References: <55C0C16D.9060809@alcatel-lucent.com> <55C83172.9020309@nteczone.com> <55C8C6D5.2060502@alcatel-lucent.com>
From: Christian Groves <Christian.Groves@nteczone.com>
Message-ID: <55C950CB.6050902@nteczone.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 11:32:59 +1000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <55C8C6D5.2060502@alcatel-lucent.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - cserver5.myshophosting.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - nteczone.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: cserver5.myshophosting.com: authenticated_id: christian.groves@nteczone.com
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mmusic/iG_-VeA_xvagHC0KcHHn-wMyQzw>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] New version draft-ietf-mmusic-data-channel-sdpneg-04
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mmusic/>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 01:33:04 -0000

Hello Juergen,

The proposed update is OK for me.

Regards, Christian

On 11/08/2015 1:44 AM, Juergen Stoetzer-Bradler wrote:
> Hello Christian,
>
> Thank you for your comment.
> Agree to adding information to 5.1.1.4 regarding the relationship of 
> the "subprotocol" parameter's value and
> DCEP DATA_CHANNEL_OPEN message's "Protocol" value. We could then also 
> explicitly add text related
> to empty "subprotocol" strings, similar to the "label" parameter 
> related text in 5.1.1.3.
> For instance:
>
> "The 'subprotocol' parameter indicates which protocol the client 
> expects to exchange via the channel.
> This parameter maps to the 'Protocol' parameter defined in 
> [I-D.ietf-rtcweb-data-protocol].
> Section 8.1 specifies how new subprotocol parameter values are 
> registered.
> 'Subprotocol' is an optional parameter. If the 'subprotocol' parameter 
> is not present, then its value defaults to the empty string.
>
> Note: The empty string MAY also be explicitly used as 'subprotocol' 
> value,  such that 'subprotocol=""' is equivalent to the 'subprotocol' 
> parameter not being
> present at all.  [I-D.ietf-rtcweb-data-protocol] allows the 
> DATA_CHANNEL_OPEN message's 'Subprotocol' value to be an empty string."
>
> Would that be ok for you?
>
> Thank you,
> Juergen
>
> On 10.08.2015 07:06, Christian Groves wrote:
>> Hello Juergen,
>>
>> Looks good, only a minor comment:
>> Cl.5.1.1.4 - The others clauses mention the mapping DCEP protocol 
>> parameter. This clause could also provide a linkage given that we 
>> agreed to use the same registry as DCEP.
>>
>> Regards, Christian
>>
>> On 4/08/2015 11:43 PM, Juergen Stoetzer-Bradler wrote:
>>> Have submitted version 04 of draft-ietf-mmusic-data-channel-sdpneg.
>>> This version solves Paul's and Albrecht's comments to -03,
>>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic/current/msg14917.html
>>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic/current/msg14922.html
>>>
>>> Especially, I've moved the old section 5, which contained SDP 
>>> offer/answer independent considerations
>>> and into which I had inserted a couple of editor's notes, to a new 
>>> Appendix A.
>>> Additionally, I've modified this moved text in order to make it as 
>>> far (JavaScript) API independent as possible.
>>> Former section 6 is therefore now section 5.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Juergen
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> mmusic mailing list
>>> mmusic@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> mmusic mailing list
>> mmusic@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mmusic mailing list
> mmusic@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic