IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [MMUSIC] AD evaluation: draft-ietf-mmusic-udptl-dtls-07

Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> Wed, 28 May 2014 19:05 UTC

Return-Path: <alissa@cooperw.in>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D435B1A6F5A for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 May 2014 12:05:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rdLeyC-oAd7H for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 May 2014 12:05:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B0061A6F3B for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 May 2014 12:05:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.42]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44C0921A86 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 May 2014 15:05:24 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 28 May 2014 15:05:24 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cooperw.in; h=date :subject:from:to:message-id:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=mesmtp; bh=6EWfvxlS+h DnwiOO7EsCHUhypEI=; b=TQgml54j0UQcvceiPrly7NLAnw+U1I1FjEYf3r6a6R wmJy5MAPBk4V3hLid0LWaA536lP/9Nxf4wwCVpZAJ7kOm3rfa3u2SA2fXgLgftQ1 Qn4ubsvtUZkCCXcPSmDJl9pQxayVA5huxja9Eu1IfNYZQgTJ3+EDbv4JbmBrLQnJ M=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=date:subject:from:to:message-id :references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=smtpout; bh=6EWfvxlS+hDnwiOO7EsCHU hypEI=; b=adV+cfEcuYAM+NBrZ8vOiqlyx0KqiujUuvgC4/0G01CxQM6aq+VROR TlFsAgy+Yj0CpVgEoBbUWeKyJgoy4nyR2OVNHlcv4zSluf80nK8agkKHpLkbGmjR B8YhropI5ManC7c/Vn4sGTVsLEzkqNNdNKtxw2hMvFXGi1XbGdEGI=
X-Sasl-enc: zWkNmqQW2oguiafgvJuuNNv9lfY37FwZH5D4HHDjTU/1 1401303923
Received: from [171.68.18.44] (unknown [171.68.18.44]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 7B46EC00003; Wed, 28 May 2014 15:05:21 -0400 (EDT)
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.9.131030
Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 12:05:13 -0700
From: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
To: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>, "mmusic@ietf.org" <mmusic@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <CFAB814C.3CE7A%alissa@cooperw.in>
Thread-Topic: AD evaluation: draft-ietf-mmusic-udptl-dtls-07
References: <CFAA77B1.3CC7D%alissa@cooperw.in> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D3418D1@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
In-Reply-To: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1D3418D1@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mmusic/iUm7SCsZK6NwYB9VvTAXMnpm5zA
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] AD evaluation: draft-ietf-mmusic-udptl-dtls-07
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic/>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 19:05:31 -0000

On 5/28/14, 1:07 AM, "Christer Holmberg" <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
wrote:

>Hi Alissa,
>
>Thanks for your review and comments! Reply inline.
>
>>I have reviewed this document in preparation for IETF last call. It’s in
>>good shape. I will issue the last call. Couple of nits to be resolved
>>with any last call comments:
>>
>>Section 1:
>>s/clearly defined, well understood and implementations are widely
>>available./clearly defined and well understood and implementations are
>>widely available./
>>
>>Section 4.5:
>>s/same rules of for/same rules for/
>
>We'll do the changes as suggested.
>
>Do you want us to do them now, before the IESG review, and submit a new
>version of the draft?

No, you can wait until LC ends.

Thanks,
Alissa

>
>Regards,
>
>Christer
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email