IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [MMUSIC] k= and draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc4566bis

Keith Drage <drageke@ntlworld.com> Tue, 12 September 2017 09:19 UTC

Return-Path: <drageke@ntlworld.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BAF5133021 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Sep 2017 02:19:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.401
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.401 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-2.8, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ntlworld.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tUArkQxCDA5I for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Sep 2017 02:19:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from know-smtprelay-omc-8.server.virginmedia.net (know-smtprelay-omc-8.server.virginmedia.net [80.0.253.72]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2873C133011 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Sep 2017 02:19:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.10] ([81.97.229.170]) by know-smtprelay-8-imp with bizsmtp id 8ZKH1w00F3hDt9d01ZKJzH; Tue, 12 Sep 2017 10:19:18 +0100
X-Originating-IP: [81.97.229.170]
X-Authenticated-User: drageke@ntlworld.com
X-Spam: 0
X-Authority: v=2.1 cv=APW+KdU1 c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=uMkRna9mZ6QJhuoPpEZIww==:117 a=uMkRna9mZ6QJhuoPpEZIww==:17 a=L9H7d07YOLsA:10 a=9cW_t1CCXrUA:10 a=s5jvgZ67dGcA:10 a=x7bEGLp0ZPQA:10 a=r77TgQKjGQsHNAKrUKIA:9 a=Nv--wQFjAAAA:8 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=vQ6dKL7GAAAA:8 a=A031uJZ7spyYwg6BhfoA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=8qpqNnEzile1kdqBD-gA:9 a=sqsceN9cjB04ZYjM:21 a=_W_S_7VecoQA:10 a=NZEjkz1c1RZEYMvUJ3LL:22 a=w1C3t2QeGrPiZgrLijVG:22 a=mJ0ar-z9p3RXkz0ikL7Z:22
To: mmusic@ietf.org
References: <619B81B4-C645-4F2F-9B4B-A4D1D95AC440@iii.ca> <CAA4Mczv3Fo=KDu3mqv1KSjO98LcdHnHX5X9rMaaQi7ofVGBNRA@mail.gmail.com> <D1D3622B-443F-4610-AB6C-370A6A70DCAC@csperkins.org>
From: Keith Drage <drageke@ntlworld.com>
Message-ID: <a9fb09c2-1df6-adb7-5037-4c3c20172a3e@ntlworld.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2017 10:19:18 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <D1D3622B-443F-4610-AB6C-370A6A70DCAC@csperkins.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------B9FD5EBDB94376C3DD3BF4F6"
Content-Language: en-US
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ntlworld.com; s=meg.feb2017; t=1505207958; bh=RYDXuZ5IIQ1685NiqVQ0+6G6WtYGWFAPG8uCFDk+csk=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=lE/Asa94VRwiAeonalvO3lpCyFG16OtZaOglDF78J+MJ3kUiG6o5sZpzN2aZBchzU W6I54w/TntL3JBFJRHGhyOCxyWsRFZQxgsVBqxfCGZ/jhuF8JI+H0q3YmwSvp1aAoB mhjfanL+d9LUPDDc3Q2jcicQ+yyoa0ZUVPWbG6jZKsRZArDTlLSsMLjs8dfFLSp/j0 07GwmpukO1v/eM0u7/9Nn4moumsm1ZDTWmv57awvXykQyUx1zY+W3WUqCbNrNjyT3l sQOkFPDfJDSsyPxsapdLGMWnYx30gA7wSh1L77MTQvNDTIyqz9kPR9PhjqAjmqMoKA qff9qJVRxWbAw==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mmusic/j7jZ_oDkaUb8WV0fJWY03EMvpoI>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] k= and draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc4566bis
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mmusic/>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2017 09:19:24 -0000

Yes, we do not want people to use it. It was regarded as an 
inappropriate inadequately defined security mechanism when it existed.

But I agree with Colin in that straight removal is nor the answer. Among 
other things, we need to consider what we want to appear in the IANA 
lists in order to ensure that the name is not reused. Is that different 
from what appears now?

Keith

On 08-Sep-17 11:24 AM, Colin Perkins wrote:
> I don’t think we can remove it – we need to document it for legacy 
> reasons, if nothing else – but we can certainly strengthen the 
> warnings not to use it.
>
> Colin
>
>
>
>> On 8 Sep 2017, at 08:14, Ali C. Begen <ali.begen@networked.media 
>> <mailto:ali.begen@networked.media>> wrote:
>>
>> I have not seen it being used, but it could be just me who has not 
>> seen it. Will be happy to remove it, if everyone agrees.
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 2:26 AM, Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca 
>> <mailto:fluffy@iii.ca>> wrote:
>>
>>     Do we still need the "k=" line in SDP? Could we just remove all
>>     of section 5.12 ?
>>
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     mmusic mailing list
>>     mmusic@ietf.org <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
>>     https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic
>>     <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> mmusic mailing list
>> mmusic@ietf.org <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic
>
>
>
> -- 
> Colin Perkins
> https://csperkins.org/
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mmusic mailing list
> mmusic@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status