Re: [MMUSIC] Merging ICE aggressive and regular nomination (was Re: [tram] Comment on draft-williams-peer-redirect-01: might it not converge?)

Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com> Sun, 03 August 2014 18:02 UTC

Return-Path: <juberti@google.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C07221A0538 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 3 Aug 2014 11:02:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.379
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.379 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id REAZ32Fq4grf for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 3 Aug 2014 11:02:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vc0-x22c.google.com (mail-vc0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c03::22c]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 126751A012D for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Sun, 3 Aug 2014 11:02:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vc0-f172.google.com with SMTP id im17so9706979vcb.17 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Sun, 03 Aug 2014 11:02:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=lp14PQ0sK6L/WxeDxoxxxFoD1yry2Dwskv95UAba0AA=; b=kvWSNNblrg7mhDHlXjdRuIy2alA692xWj304/lCJwRnkz5uzhNmG+d1r8oXaeZ6vPA sVWUI4qsdAdTWSHyqstoR+7Unn9+mfMztC0MYwpvUjEYIcGVSYR3jhGFBYBuRELVxCLF wT3I6TDBr5mRyGLpZEzSxp9899sM3Y1xnZQYge2J0uqhwlI+p0w31BlGileWyA/J60Ys 5oeozUPtxvhHeceUhXTdvWV7bntHRmqdP9UVjaD83g70FtY77Pz4ptY/TRPa4VW0GmiR LakA6JhdiTdJJnaOgEe7XKo9qcq8fabteiAcQKm82UxN52Jc+U+K2eE76okkaDW8qk7P nRkg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=lp14PQ0sK6L/WxeDxoxxxFoD1yry2Dwskv95UAba0AA=; b=SNBQmwYxRBLuvx5BfaYpsgZqjHIn89GjyPDASrE9paGsW2Yiqu+Om3UhL2EerNsJI9 XtyI4nhy87kY94TRiiVv/zYWL/hEoFLfPiecJ7nB0nGcY41W1L0ffkWvsez45Co58vdj C7xjDASYdfHEnYxIQRspfEp8Sot8VfM63Ree+8+r6jQR5mPQL34oXwPfb64ZuiLLvxdg Pr7D3EXeekR+ts8OD3/IAz3ofzOeVe9oVJyi+ZKPmoF8rUnB2Uu+9t9MI5wDLW5wXWlH Vn3QixLhGsyzDhVks91ztxtRi9TrcKXPkQrBXoEi+1972CwqSkLrP+K3p5V9WtS+MRd7 uBEw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlhCsKAPO8YU7q1XB4/SViXlHzQ3aTt5zenVDxLZRTjTQW3fvYFxDqtwemNKDcN2pVt8Wph
X-Received: by 10.52.3.40 with SMTP id 8mr1962826vdz.24.1407088945149; Sun, 03 Aug 2014 11:02:25 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.52.133.193 with HTTP; Sun, 3 Aug 2014 11:02:05 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnVwdOmeu4TwsArW4fv+J98Ln1GswTVjPzvvTHmPSa+1eQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <0DA61D09-6491-4DA4-8B6F-CFED70584A76@vidyo.com> <CAOJ7v-1jLK7dWDkWHKwHJ6qXicZWDNrAqOtw9R=6zAcWzkh5+g@mail.gmail.com> <53D796E5.9040009@jive.com> <2AF26344-DF5D-493C-96BC-80AD7DF35444@vidyo.com> <CAOJ7v-0HEjQQ+j0cAVc5r3Y4LxaoGF7EN2twGG6vTuMmEeragQ@mail.gmail.com> <8D2E9E91-B0B7-4081-B65B-EDAEC4D23A97@vidyo.com> <CAOJ7v-1HzGoUNXjvXph0-8WfpM6-vFJ+yDWhVw1_1grfrVD1Vw@mail.gmail.com> <B2794643-ADB5-4B66-98DC-841990C85437@vidyo.com> <CAOJ7v-2O3TwNcsKqp48PjDRu+Yu_+jEurecbO2GctD4Hsuu+NA@mail.gmail.com> <48776423-8594-4133-BD23-3EA561EC2A9D@vidyo.com> <CAOJ7v-13UZi4w7Vfr2dkghaosrwVYkTw5G2shq0JUvLPy30vTw@mail.gmail.com> <CAOJ7v-0s6EVa4KxQY99wB-BaDGr5EZwVunxrW4BBgVJLEuWhiQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAPvvaa+sKWtGSaWvo6Vx=vhMbbhmLQKr2o9Z3Wjkm2-5TXDjHw@mail.gmail.com> <CAPvvaaJDT0cgWhNkeKMKWUnHvRgZaEb9VXjV3+wHCx15_Z6+wg@mail.gmail.com> <CAPvvaaLNjZr-3NmdJOAV-Ov6qQ1gZoEOF1dk4W52gEOUq4214g@mail.gmail.com> <CALiegf=QASGR2+FuY7TKoJYrdvqbDxyUyKxvMQ13do5YX4GUyw@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnXvs_7fjQfCjeXMn4_RZExc8mYAQzqvq_fznc+kwGkKqA@mail.gmail.com> <CALiegfmp5YJwO62+fUN8AB=-A8rbenko_P7r35jo_CdUT6MWbA@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnXzNVgrYK6gjWmdyBoJ1Cog45XTP7F3yzaqOmm=GTypzA@mail.gmail.com> <CAOJ7v-1wzU0yMs21XYOpersa9f8u0=1n-mJ1BNrO-rEu3x9K5w@mail.gmail.com> <CALiegf=DJVZgEruEEGY4J7YiQk1jpzcDkztrT+Nosyrbjn0q5g@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnV0mBKgPj+9zNPcmTTLAGsz42eTMuAo14bnneSOowmR8w@mail.gmail.com> <CALiegfnn0Vs-TeTn29fhC4Hb9RFVZOAzx7ZQHRCVBDp=VF+ObQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAPvvaaLQwrxO9VcsjFNd+Mon49iC=jqREY3HOorbRW=EY7a=hQ@mail.gmail.com> <CALiegfm=oMYK7hb3ezjt5P3ZDMdCy2YG9vVqiJa8kOgjD6X=yQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAPvvaa+3rGuyj2=bsO8UDqhe878f18dUkF41jV9FbVqadc=mvw@mail.gmail.com> <CALiegfn2H9ZUsni=T1Axm+_-p+OO_2bH51xvwTftTgaL7=2Vew@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnVwdOmeu4TwsArW4fv+J98Ln1GswTVjPzvvTHmPSa+1eQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2014 11:02:05 -0700
Message-ID: <CAOJ7v-2pQa0DQqu-XOwYtCLBiNHgtzV5uoQqZy3wHZb0Zkv5+w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf3030c11fbe632304ffbd6ca4
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mmusic/jT7ZeICO7JYLhIoh7tuR1uKs_WY
Cc: mmusic <mmusic@ietf.org>, Jonathan Lennox <jonathan@vidyo.com>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] Merging ICE aggressive and regular nomination (was Re: [tram] Comment on draft-williams-peer-redirect-01: might it not converge?)
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic/>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Aug 2014 18:02:28 -0000

On Sun, Aug 3, 2014 at 8:02 AM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
wrote:

>
> On Aug 3, 2014 7:20 AM, "Iñaki Baz Castillo" <ibc@aliax.net> wrote:
> > - In that case both ICE Requests are different (different
> > transactionId and so on) so both DTLS HelloClient packets must also be
> > different, and hence we are talking about *two* separate DTLS
> > handshakes, which means that PeerB MUST handle two different DTLS
> > sessions into the same local candidate/interface.
>
> I think that you are jumping to conclusions here. What Dan suggested isn't
> really part of what Emil is talking about, it is an additional
> optimization. As such, it's orthogonal.
>
>
> Yes. I think we've lost sight of the original intent of this thread -
either allowing aggressive nomination to make dynamic decisions like
regular nomination, or combining the two concepts entirely.

Let's try to focus on the details of that particular problem in this thread.