Re: [MMUSIC] Simulcast worries: What bitrate? (from the WEBRTC list)

Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> Thu, 22 October 2015 14:56 UTC

To: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>, "mmusic@ietf.org" <mmusic@ietf.org>
References: <56279638.9030007@alvestrand.no>
From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <5628F926.7060304@nostrum.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 09:56:38 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <56279638.9030007@alvestrand.no>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mmusic/jXPuwBX1vrvF3NgLmpK7G_Vtey0>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] Simulcast worries: What bitrate? (from the WEBRTC list)
Precedence: list

On 10/21/15 08:42, Harald Alvestrand wrote:
> I'd be happier if we could say "this is the same bitrate as b=TEAS" or
> something like that - if an implementation has to stick to multiple
> definitions of bitrate for the same media flow, which will happen with
> a=rid .. max-br and b= in the same message, it would be nice to be able
> to use the same counters.

I'm good either way. We can keep this as-is, or add a reference to 
RFC3890. Anyone want to speak for or against moving over to the RFC3890 
definition of bandwidth?

/a

[MMUSIC] Simulcast worries: What bitrate? (from t… Harald Alvestrand
Re: [MMUSIC] Simulcast worries: What bitrate? (fr… Adam Roach
Re: [MMUSIC] Simulcast worries: What bitrate? (fr… Magnus Westerlund
Re: [MMUSIC] Simulcast worries: What bitrate? (fr… Adam Roach