Re: [MMUSIC] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on charter-ietf-mmusic-04-00: (with COMMENT)

Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> Thu, 07 February 2019 07:07 UTC

Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECC07126F72; Wed, 6 Feb 2019 23:07:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.679
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.679 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Mo4PBHsnoIwV; Wed, 6 Feb 2019 23:07:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B9F371228B7; Wed, 6 Feb 2019 23:07:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.0.1.29] (cpe-70-122-203-106.tx.res.rr.com [70.122.203.106]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id x177732D064593 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 7 Feb 2019 01:07:04 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1549523225; bh=1Enb9Dq22SvtwqmsyLGV2hxergUQ8fusXJ7I6fC64yA=; h=From:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:Cc:To:References; b=RERmqtXCuJdnlWZ8jVV0LQxMIH+6QhwLYEv+O3Tzw3ilacbzZqRwQJxezGXG/XGxK ow3xkUenMENqrG5s4eRBq+5Vwivh7jdrzaR35W3hK5W6i78hHZJcBNle23JzMNw/js QESA+jOUAGq65THaSrt1rOiyeFXaQpYLoIYyRux0=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host cpe-70-122-203-106.tx.res.rr.com [70.122.203.106] claimed to be [10.0.1.29]
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
Message-Id: <F6FF007F-0D68-43FB-9841-14DECB4C7563@nostrum.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_F9176729-A46C-4F13-9C68-BDEDE0F550BC"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.2 \(3445.102.3\))
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2019 01:07:01 -0600
In-Reply-To: <154945436949.31050.7163847983446120931.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, mmusic-chairs@ietf.org, mmusic@ietf.org
To: =?utf-8?Q?Mirja_K=C3=BChlewind?= <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
References: <154945436949.31050.7163847983446120931.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.102.3)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mmusic/jyoxiv19jLweykxKjJGsG-SEybg>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] =?utf-8?q?Mirja_K=C3=BChlewind=27s_No_Objection_on_char?= =?utf-8?q?ter-ietf-mmusic-04-00=3A_=28with_COMMENT=29?=
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mmusic/>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2019 07:07:07 -0000


> On Feb 6, 2019, at 5:59 AM, Mirja Kühlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net> wrote:
> 
> Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for
> charter-ietf-mmusic-04-00: No Objection
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-mmusic/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Just wondering if we should approve this now or when ICE is actually closed (to
> avoid confusion). Or when is ICE to be expected to be closed?

ICE only has one unpublished milestone, and that one is in the RFC Editor queue. It will close as soon as that one is processed. They won’t be taking on new work.

Thanks!

Ben.