Re: [MMUSIC] draft-ietf-rtcweb-mdns-ice-candidates

[Justin Uberti <[e-mail]>]

This is currently supported in Safari iOS, and we are working to bring this
to Chrome Android as well.

On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 8:47 AM Roman Shpount <[e-mail]> wrote:

> I would like to see if there any implementations of this draft on mobile
> networks. I think this draft's interactions with mobile network deployment
> scenarios, such as 464XLAT, should be examined in detail before this draft
> is ready for publication. Also, mDNS is not currently supported on Android,
> which represents a significant portion of this draft use case, making some
> of the implementation details a bit fuzzy. My main concern here is if the
> mDNS name which is associated with one IP address always resolves to the
> same IP address with the same address family when resolved on the same
> network.
>
> Best Regards,
> _____________
> Roman Shpount
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 11:04 AM Flemming Andreasen <fandreas=
> [e-mail]> wrote:
>
>> By publication we mean that the draft is considered to be in the final
>> ready state with no known issues, whether technical or editorial. At that
>> point, the Working Group chairs will do (another) thorough review of the
>> document, and if it looks ready then ask for publication of the document,
>> which means it will be sent to the responsible Area Director for review,
>> and subsequently to the IESG for further review and eventually it's
>> published as an RFC.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> -- Flemming
>>
>> On 10/21/20 10:48 AM, Youenn Fablet wrote:
>>
>> I am also fuzzy about what it means to publish the draft.
>> It seems to me the document is ready for another version to be published.
>> To produce the final version that we expect to go to validation, we
>> should probably finish resolving the 8 remaining issues and update the spec
>> according the resolutions of these 8 issues.
>>
>> On 21 Oct 2020, at 16:33, Flemming Andreasen <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>
>> It all depends on how mature the draft is, especially in terms of its
>> technical content. Also, we will need a few reviewers to look closely at
>> the draft to see if there are any issues the authors may not have thought
>> of.
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> -- Flemming
>>
>>
>>
>> On 10/20/20 10:55 PM, Qingsi Wang wrote:
>>
>> Hi Flemming,
>>
>> I'm sorry for not being familiar with the process. In addition to
>> editorial revisions and addressing comments, are there other prerequisites
>> for publication?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Qingsi
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 7:47 PM Flemming Andreasen <[e-mail]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks Justin. What do the authors view as a realistic timeframe for
>>> getting the draft ready for publication ?
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>>
>>> -- Flemming
>>>
>>> On 10/19/20 8:08 PM, Justin Uberti wrote:
>>>
>>> New draft posted (now with -mmusic name) and waiting for approval.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 12:40 PM Justin Uberti <[e-mail]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> This fell off my radar, will update the draft shortly though.
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 9:13 AM Flemming Andreasen <fandreas=
>>>> [e-mail]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> It looks like we have at least 5 people interested in and willing to
>>>>> contribute to the work. Based on this, the chairs will work with our AD on
>>>>> getting a new milestone added.
>>>>>
>>>>> I see that the current draft has expired though - can we get an
>>>>> updated version submitted first ?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>
>>>>> -- Flemming (as MMUSIC co-chair)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 9/2/20 2:57 PM, Qingsi Wang wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I am interested and willing to contribute to this document too.
>>>>>
>>>>> Best,
>>>>> Qingsi
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 11:51 AM Youenn Fablet <youenn=
>>>>> [e-mail]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I am interested and willing to contribute to the document.
>>>>>> The proposal being implemented by various parties, having this
>>>>>> document be reviewed and ironed out as much as possible is valuable.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Y
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2 Sep 2020, at 20:09, Flemming Andreasen <[e-mail]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So far I've only seen 2 people expressing an interest in this
>>>>>> document.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is anybody else interested, and if so, are you willing to contribute
>>>>>> and/or review the document ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -- Flemming (as MMUSIC co-chair)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 7/31/20 12:16 AM, Roman Shpount wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am strongly in favor of adopting this draft to MMUSIC and getting
>>>>>> it completed.
>>>>>> _____________
>>>>>> Roman Shpount
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 7:33 PM Justin Uberti <juberti=
>>>>>> [e-mail]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> With the closure of rtcweb, we have been advised to find a new forum
>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtcweb-mdns-ice-candidates-04,
>>>>>>> and MMUSIC seems like the best home for it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I believe this document is in fairly good shape and should be ready
>>>>>>> for last call soon. Any objections to taking it on in this working group?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Justin
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> mmusic mailing list
>>>>>>> [e-mail]
>>>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> mmusic mailing [e-mail]://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> mmusic mailing list
>>>>>> [e-mail]
>>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> mmusic mailing [e-mail]://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> mmusic mailing [e-mail]://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> mmusic mailing [e-mail]://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> mmusic mailing list
>> [e-mail]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic
>>
>