Re: [MMUSIC] SDP work needed for WebRTC stuff

Cullen Jennings <> Mon, 10 December 2012 19:29 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AC8B21F84B9; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 11:29:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VUTWoriF6D3h; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 11:29:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7BAF21F84B5; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 11:29:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from (unknown []) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B5F5522E253; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 14:28:54 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\))
From: Cullen Jennings <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 11:31:08 -0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <>
References: <> <> <> <>
To: "DRAGE, Keith (Keith)" <>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499)
Cc: "Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <>, "<>" <>, mmusic WG <>, "<>" <>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] SDP work needed for WebRTC stuff
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 19:29:02 -0000

On Dec 10, 2012, at 5:16 , "DRAGE, Keith (Keith)" <> wrote:

> This is not just MMUSIC, there are bits of AVTCORE and AVTEXT responsibility in there as well.

can you add a bit on what is needed in these WG just so I can keep track of it all

> And I don't see how you can suddenly extend the interim of RTCWEB to the scope of other working groups, without even having a discussion with all the relevant chairs.

I did not mean to do any such thing - obviously the MMUSIC WG would need to decide what to how it was going to do the work. All I was trying to say is there are some things that I think needs to be done in MMUSIC and I view it as out of scope for rtcweb. This clearly came as a surprise to some people who thought that was the main thing the interim meeting was going to be about. As an individual contributor for to the MMUSIC wg, I think that mmusic needs to figure out a substantial block of face to face time to sort out these SDP issues. I look forward to proposals on how to do that.