IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [MMUSIC] Notes from Orlando human language draft discussion

Gunnar Hellstrom <gunnar.hellstrom@omnitor.se> Thu, 11 July 2013 19:28 UTC

Return-Path: <gunnar.hellstrom@omnitor.se>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBC6021F9E72 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 12:28:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ggvqNQpgi5Ck for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 12:28:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vsp-authed-03-02.binero.net (vsp-authed02.binero.net [195.74.38.226]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 3D99B21F9EDC for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 12:28:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp01.binero.se (unknown [195.74.38.28]) by vsp-authed-03-02.binero.net (Halon Mail Gateway) with ESMTP for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 21:27:52 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.50.38] (h79n2fls31o933.telia.com [212.181.137.79]) (Authenticated sender: gunnar.hellstrom@omnitor.se) by smtp-05-01.atm.binero.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id E688C3A160 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 21:27:51 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <51DF0739.7040107@omnitor.se>
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 21:27:53 +0200
From: Gunnar Hellstrom <gunnar.hellstrom@omnitor.se>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: mmusic@ietf.org
References: <p0624061acd691d9b38bc@dhcp-42ec.meeting.ietf.org> <B0295A41-BF2B-4520-8495-7A88B4803F30@acmepacket.com> <5144E4E5.4030801@omnitor.se> <03559DEF-E442-4118-A616-8D7E42D1F22A@acmepacket.com> <5145729C.6030905@omnitor.se> <514FE5A9.3060900@nteczone.com> <p06240615cdfea836f364@[99.111.97.136]> <51DBB813.4060607@nteczone.com> <p0624060ece02360a322d@[99.111.97.136]> <51DC9B66.6090302@omnitor.se> <51DCE7CB.7080205@nteczone.com> <51DE43FC.6080508@omnitor.se> <51DEFB22.4090802@alum.mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <51DEFB22.4090802@alum.mit.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] Notes from Orlando human language draft discussion
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 19:28:08 -0000

On 2013-07-11 20:36, Paul Kyzivat wrote:
>>
>>
>> And for both relay service invocation and any other assisting service
>> invocation, it is best for the user to dial the destination, and get the
>> assisting service invoked by an indication like this in the call, rather
>> than being forced to first call an assisting service and with them
>> discuss who is the final destination of the call.
>
> Viewed this way, it is similar to recognizing the need for, and 
> recruiting, a transcoder. (See RFCs 5369 & 5370.)
Yes, that is a useful model. Especially the bridge, because there you 
can let all three parties take part of common media when that makes sense.

/Gunnar

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email