Re: [MMUSIC] What should we do with the middleboxes draft (draft-ietf-mmusic-media-path-middleboxes) ?
Flemming Andreasen <firstname.lastname@example.org> Wed, 19 June 2013 14:26 UTC
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1267421F9C10 for <email@example.com>; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 07:26:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.565 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.033, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([184.108.40.206]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id avGNOH7MZVRR for <firstname.lastname@example.org>; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 07:26:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com [220.127.116.11]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E68421F9C0D for <email@example.com>; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 07:26:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; firstname.lastname@example.org; l=9980; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1371651994; x=1372861594; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to; bh=jp7t0mLqYio1XV/6uiv2e20OXpQ+dZq1pZDrqPe54bU=; b=HCzABB6qWDwe4EG4K1rlM/3cTfL49RjNope7f/edvz5PULHID6wH70aY jWb9O3RLl+y+HLp7iRAyucgN4LhAb6Nu/P6WsjSIBzMFdz3uliShhPpNQ 22v5KFvlsjctoq1RQVnmLTVJF9KyJkoO6tbl+medKAi4SX55RneVkU4kp U=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.87,896,1363132800"; d="scan'208,217"; a="224811827"
Received: from rcdn-core2-3.cisco.com ([18.104.22.168]) by rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 19 Jun 2013 14:26:33 +0000
Received: from Flemmings-MacBook-Pro.local ([10.86.252.18]) by rcdn-core2-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r5JEQVLW014822; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 14:26:32 GMT
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 10:26:32 -0400
From: Flemming Andreasen <email@example.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6
To: Hannes Tschofenig <Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net>
References: <51BA44CC.firstname.lastname@example.org> <trinity-cc270c67-c2a1-40d3-b893-2ae74bb93a8e-1371643907833@3capp-gmx-bs32>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------010207010002090403050909"
Cc: Ari Keranen <email@example.com>, mmusic <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Hadriel Kaplan <HKaplan@acmepacket.com>, email@example.com
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] What should we do with the middleboxes draft (draft-ietf-mmusic-media-path-middleboxes) ?
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:email@example.com?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 14:26:39 -0000
On 6/19/13 8:11 AM, Hannes Tschofenig wrote: > Hi Flemming, > I am still willing to continue and complete this work. > Gonzalo and I had tried to reach out to Hadriel numerous times to > better understand his review remarks but unfortunately without success. I have seen several e-mails on the MMUSIC list from Hadriel raising issues/questions but I haven't seen the follow-ups from the document authors to resolve those. Please make sure to use the mailing list. Thanks -- Flemming > Ciao > Hannes > PS: Btw, the "significant concerns", as you called them, came from one > person, Hadriel. > *Gesendet:* Freitag, 14. Juni 2013 um 00:16 Uhr > *Von:* "Flemming Andreasen" <firstname.lastname@example.org> > *An:* mmusic <email@example.com> > *Cc:* "Ari Keranen" <firstname.lastname@example.org>om>, "Hadriel Kaplan" > <HKaplan@acmepacket.com>om>, > email@example.com > *Betreff:* [MMUSIC] What should we do with the middleboxes draft > (draft-ietf-mmusic-media-path-middleboxes) ? > Greetings MMUSIC > > As noted previously > (http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic/current/msg09368.html), > we currently have a milestone for " Considerations for using SDP > offer/answer with middleboxes" and we have a WG draft for that in the > form of > > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mmusic-media-path-middleboxes/ > > When we polled for interest in this work about 1 year ago (per the > above thread), there was some indication of continued interest in the > work, however there were also some (significant) concerns expressed > with the draft itself (see e.g. most recent thread in > http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic/current/msg10163.html). > These concerns have existed for well over a year and we have seen very > little discussion or active work trying to resolve them. > > In lieu of the above, the chairs would like to ask the WG participants to > > 1) Indicate if you are in favor of continuing this work. > > 2) If you are willing to actively contribute to the work by either > a) Sign on as co-author, drive the open issues to resolution, and > update the document accordingly > b) Actively contribute to discussion and resolution of open issues in > the draft. > > Please note, that if you answer "yes" to 2a or 2b, then you should > assume that you *will* get called upon to deliver on that. > > Also please note, that if we do not get sufficient positive responses > to both 1 and 2 above, then our plan is to remove the milestone and > abandon the WG draft. > > Thanks > > -- Ari & Flemming (MMUSIC co-chairs) > > > > > > > > > > > > > .
- [MMUSIC] What should we do with the middleboxes d… Flemming Andreasen
- Re: [MMUSIC] What should we do with the middlebox… Muthu Arul Mozhi Perumal (mperumal)
- Re: [MMUSIC] What should we do with the middlebox… Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [MMUSIC] What should we do with the middlebox… Flemming Andreasen
- Re: [MMUSIC] What should we do with the middlebox… Hadriel Kaplan