Re: [MMUSIC] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-mmusic-data-channel-sdpneg-25: (with COMMENT)

"Roni Even (A)" <roni.even@huawei.com> Thu, 11 April 2019 09:50 UTC

From: "Roni Even (A)" <roni.even@huawei.com>
To: Mirja Kühlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-mmusic-data-channel-sdpneg@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mmusic-data-channel-sdpneg@ietf.org>, Bo Burman <bo.burman@ericsson.com>, "mmusic-chairs@ietf.org" <mmusic-chairs@ietf.org>, "mmusic@ietf.org" <mmusic@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-mmusic-data-channel-sdpneg-25: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHU68sw/YSnkciZbUuyklXvy0atWKY2vu7A
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2019 09:50:19 +0000
Message-ID: <6E58094ECC8D8344914996DAD28F1CCD18CDB5D4@dggemm526-mbx.china.huawei.com>
References: <155448109368.10029.4766956503581760917.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <155448109368.10029.4766956503581760917.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mmusic/nLJXyqAKXBDpS-w4sC2tNMa6jx8>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-mmusic-data-channel-sdpneg-25: (with COMMENT)
Precedence: list

Hi Mirja,
Thanks

See inline
Roni

-----Original Message-----
From: Mirja Kühlewind via Datatracker [mailto:noreply@ietf.org] 
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2019 7:18 PM
To: The IESG
Cc: draft-ietf-mmusic-data-channel-sdpneg@ietf.org; Bo Burman; mmusic-chairs@ietf.org; bo.burman@ericsson.com; mmusic@ietf.org
Subject: Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-mmusic-data-channel-sdpneg-25: (with COMMENT)

Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-mmusic-data-channel-sdpneg-25: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mmusic-data-channel-sdpneg/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks for quickly addressing the comments from the TSV-ART review regarding interactions with SCTP (and thanks Micheal T. for the review!)!

One minor, more editorial comment on max-time parameter:
draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-protocol says "This life-time starts when providing the user message to the protocol stack.". While a reference to draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-protocol is given respectively, I would recommend to also clarify in this draft which time frame is meant given this time frame includes and end-to-end delays.
[RE] are you suggesting to repeat the text from the RTCweb document " A user message will no longer be transmitted or retransmitted after a  specified life-time given in milliseconds in the 'max-time' parameter. The life-time starts
         when providing the user message to the protocol stack."
   

As a side note: not sure it is necessary to expand IETF (Internet Engineering Task Force) (see sec 5.2) in an IETF RFC but the RFC editor might tell you...
[RE] will remove

[MMUSIC] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-… Mirja Kühlewind via Datatracker
Re: [MMUSIC] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on dr… Benjamin Kaduk
Re: [MMUSIC] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on dr… Roni Even (A)
Re: [MMUSIC] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on dr… Mirja Kuehlewind