Re: [MMUSIC] draft-ietf-mmusic-sctp-sdp-07 SCTP SDP syntax question

What is the status of the draft-ejzak-mmusic-data-channel-sdpneg-00?

It has expired and is based on the old SDP SCTP syntax. Particularly the 
example in cl.4:

    m=application 54111 DTLS/SCTP 5000 5001 5002
    c=IN IP4 79.97.215.79
    a=sctpmap:5000 webrtc-datachannel
    a=sctpmap:5001 bfcp
    a=sctpmap:5002 t38

Wouldn't apply if we're saying to use multiple m-lines.

I guess cl.5.1.1.3 would use the same Websocket subprotocol name 
registry as data channel does?

Regards, Christian

On 2/10/2014 12:14 AM, Paul Kyzivat wrote:
> On 10/1/14 3:44 AM, Christian Groves wrote:
>
>>> <Sal>
>>> there have been several discussion about the ability to have more than
>>> one usage of the SCTP association,
>>> and has been agreed not to allow it.
>>> So each 'm' line describes a single SCTP association;  each
>>> association has only one single specify usage.
>>> </Sal>
>>
>> [CNG] So how would I specify in SDP a scenario where BFCP uses a
>> DTLS/SCTP association and MSRP uses a DTLS/SCTP association where they
>> both use the same DTLS connection? Are these to be separate m-lines?
>
> To have two different SCTP associations over the same DTLS connection, 
> they would have to be distinguished by sctp-port. To achieve that you 
> could write two m-lines. They would share the same ip address and 
> port, and would have different "a=sctp-port" lines. Then they would 
> have to be bundled.
>
> Doing that would require extending the definition of bundle to cover 
> that case. (There is no *technical* problem in doing this.)
>
> OTOH, in principle they don't need their own SCTP association. AFAIK 
> they each only use one sctp stream-pair (channel). If they could agree 
> on how to choose channels then they could share an SCTP association. 
> That is where draft-ejzak... comes in.
>
>     Thanks,
>     Paul
>
> _______________________________________________
> mmusic mailing list
> mmusic@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic
>