Re: [MMUSIC] [rtcweb] Tunnelling DTLS in SDP

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Mon, 04 April 2016 17:34 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE0C812D60F; Mon, 4 Apr 2016 10:34:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UCkB8yPx8Xwz; Mon, 4 Apr 2016 10:34:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ig0-x231.google.com (mail-ig0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5094712D12E; Mon, 4 Apr 2016 10:34:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ig0-x231.google.com with SMTP id g8so40346015igr.0; Mon, 04 Apr 2016 10:34:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=TokuKdW0ADzGH3lJNCaQsMCzI3ZR9tsLGNUolC2Woa0=; b=HQcfMMvhN+lyb38nFTYVYsy39FEJKpZvLwmNIb7sbsUl7LgmDmNZe4CN8haJw90nBH PVeWP+lLZv5ZoHhR3JOTuR8VmBwc479iPV4ODYbVcVsCjWPA0wZSuDy6V9tCOJWPoDeP VVBpHZ8fSDaAEX/+oSNh7N2U016TdtZWRCZ6MIdRxxk4FScDD0NLmjDG3Lo38tEGfw+V Tarn43tqILQq8mqWyKvq4Y9ErVKsIxI6mJWEXmcws2k1AK68k08aagBA6kgjc7jkSLT1 dLyUdv07bor35y5CFd7LMwtajwnUtTmCPkLQD5QUHy+peEu4rx8s+u/CAAFv8EnWCUJX djgg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=TokuKdW0ADzGH3lJNCaQsMCzI3ZR9tsLGNUolC2Woa0=; b=ljTdjwvZ2sHpQP5zr1C/HYrfttj4JNMLNz0QAUK0Ut2nElql+kAtGU+/1oN1QdVAgg ZL+06ffMb2W6vmBe48VUDtuynXxpQct1hJVfVEAj9RlBGcrMIiVY+p7bMVKoWzhDSysn +QZdlUSuKWz6gYQtFJeiwYA9DyRvM+PXVREFcUZjALWq5mMAyOALrgTD8mH7quBN8Voi DaQo8qJitMN78Wk89WA/Wh4t2MuIw1Jv/r8fKFOkgVIs1f7lCogdWata5Z3R/pNXDugy dpS7FzILHRkXvJycUIaBi7WQNdTx0gCErTKOa0lSCi0XxpvBxtpnlX1yP3iyjvu2dwjf dlTA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJJ4AC3lUxZPPkp5aGPydsdQSVcuBJZKe98x220ZfYSakl/BzASc+IxQ2JIwmMzcL5kkeEXqRE3B6jQGjw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.221.67 with SMTP id qc3mr12769650igc.77.1459791269598; Mon, 04 Apr 2016 10:34:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.36.43.5 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Apr 2016 10:34:29 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <D5416C24-0032-48CB-8CC6-FD5D4E046C0D@phonefromhere.com>
References: <CABcZeBOM1KoXpXFhvjS753EVpsMENWVen3CCdFj8ry36vPH0dg@mail.gmail.com> <D5416C24-0032-48CB-8CC6-FD5D4E046C0D@phonefromhere.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2016 14:34:29 -0300
Message-ID: <CABkgnnX8sFokYpNEYG=qa=cqfJwUwjC8ucgbay5bQoezGAvpxg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: pfh <tim@phonefromhere.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mmusic/ohrY3GmXyhYMfRREjgPi5VztC-M>
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>, mmusic WG <mmusic@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] [rtcweb] Tunnelling DTLS in SDP
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mmusic/>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2016 17:34:32 -0000

On 4 April 2016 at 12:39, pfh <tim@phonefromhere.com> wrote:
> It strikes me we could get the same reduced latency benefits by piggybacking
> on ICE
> rather than SDP, e.g. embedding the DTLS packet as data in a new STUN
> attribute type.

One of the goals for connectivity checks is to keep them small.
Cramming DTLS in is not compatible with this.