Re: [MMUSIC] Updating SDP parameter registry with RFC3108 values

On 10/6/13 11:28 PM, Christian Groves wrote:
> Hello Flemming,
>
> Thanks for pointing out that thread. If Paul as one of the SDP
> directorate is OK with it then I don't have any issue with the -cs draft.
>
> I think though that the addresstype and nettype from RFC3108 still needs
> to be picked up by the IANA registry.

I agree. I'm not sure what the best way to accomplish that is.
Perhaps an errata to 3108, pointing out that it fails to register its 
new nettype and addrtypes with IANA would start the process. Or is there 
a better way?

	Thanks,
	Paul

> Regards, Christian
>
> On 7/10/2013 12:38 PM, Flemming Andreasen wrote:
>> Hi Christian
>>
>> We had a thread on this particular issue about a year ago. See
>>
>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic/current/msg09599.html
>>
>> and the conclusion in
>>
>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic/current/msg09621.html
>>
>> I hope this addresses your concern as it relates to -cs draft.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> -- Flemming
>>
>>
>> On 9/19/13 8:22 AM, Christian Groves wrote:
>>> FYI, I was looking at the IANA registry for SDP parameters (
>>> http://www.iana.org/assignments/sdp-parameters/sdp-parameters.xhtml)
>>> and noticed that there was a registration for addrtype E164 linked to
>>> this CS draft.
>>>
>>> There's a problem that there's already an addrtype E164 in RFC3108.
>>> This earlier usage of E164 should have been registered with IANA but
>>> seems to have been missed. To complicate things the format of the
>>> RFC3108 E164 addrtype is different to the one in the CS draft.
>>>
>>> I've already raised this with IANA but I thought it would be worth
>>> mentioning in MMUSIC.
>>>
>>> Christian
>
> _______________________________________________
> mmusic mailing list
> mmusic@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic
>