Re: [MMUSIC] Mirja Kühlewind's Discuss on draft-ietf-mmusic-sctp-sdp-23: (with DISCUSS)

Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Thu, 16 February 2017 15:03 UTC

Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81CEB129A30 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 07:03:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8KzSwLhFLsDE for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 07:03:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yw0-x22f.google.com (mail-yw0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B2800129509 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 07:03:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-yw0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id l19so9309191ywc.2 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 07:03:17 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=ewtVM0ibbD9RP2dGJ4sLPDTmpZQYsFvz/ShIJ4aUM6M=; b=aA2elORnlhZT9RneI/dcwkz/+YwUZz4LoJ8ualjYXChtaR69yA3W3IR5xPcV6zFfBn JW87FnYP8+fqSu9zTWP7w/gDVvvd+RtnO2KAPXJLiYa2F+gjvFqCNGw6eqHVk2I11lFy 25HF0uijvvwWcvzO/n7CGoUJz56AVsX4qRlOZSaoLMoeKPwbmkEoUAA6PN1vQtMS3CAu bG9X3nL6PWIF4L2E3nm9UY3g+rvd7HL7ByEvtzqDq8YhTMcb2VxRurvhXg7xK+ru0jan CE/+GYOGgMXEVKmUFDyAcqgTuyqVi49CvYbhs+pEM2i31uihVC6yP/jNMSuAI58WrspW KVpg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ewtVM0ibbD9RP2dGJ4sLPDTmpZQYsFvz/ShIJ4aUM6M=; b=asR//EOawJR4tzFZF4I28jAxUgCnPnDBW+V/NWRCSbIfQsTIv5pQ6oZpnwOfkPBOH/ aDeMwHnNWOIrbWbOO76ZfmNXJGFfpRHJM99FyPfKDmXxoA/Wtpym963tScBcFnybUiW0 fAWM/6FBm6dzHlWH55rUdiegyN1xwsyqLwpEHrEWYQuv3A22zJ0i4VVWxaSOf0FAUfUE L3apS7JQ9lz3I43vR+GR8MjgvGC4JOlmAGOUafhfebjtQKgTLDLG+HnWMgC9SLmOkmv8 I4HD/Opkcnlt+aGUnlqvmy8PF7xYbYZeAPIFeVqeziT3YHvCjack2fEBYsfFzq07Htex kTjw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39kUhCeTiBoie+4QOGSlZBvYoUOB463dUQGcPUgR8M+XRC2yo+8ug/TlUjQODNjSTnRMPvAyeriXSBIMuA==
X-Received: by 10.129.162.130 with SMTP id z124mr2040136ywg.276.1487257396727; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 07:03:16 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.13.204.80 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 07:02:36 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B4C00438C@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
References: <148724403323.15929.1432579178871938006.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B4C0040D6@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <9F29D433-0AE1-43B0-B13E-AEC2861DFE75@kuehlewind.net> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B4C00438C@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 07:02:36 -0800
Message-ID: <CABcZeBPPFUe-ZtW9Lt636OhoMH8ws2oVi94YQJeUQKXteC-XRg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c129292d2b46d0548a71827"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mmusic/pGiCJjBTxjHWxohiLXbqzUa-fEg>
Cc: "mmusic-chairs@ietf.org" <mmusic-chairs@ietf.org>, "mmusic@ietf.org" <mmusic@ietf.org>, "fandreas@cisco.com" <fandreas@cisco.com>, "Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF)" <ietf@kuehlewind.net>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-mmusic-sctp-sdp@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mmusic-sctp-sdp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] Mirja Kühlewind's Discuss on draft-ietf-mmusic-sctp-sdp-23: (with DISCUSS)
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mmusic/>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 15:03:23 -0000

As Christer says. This design is optimized for making the media stack
simpler, which
using TLS here would not do.

-Ekr




On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 7:00 AM, Christer Holmberg <
christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> DISCUSS:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> >>> Why is this using TCP/DTLS/SCTP instead of TCP/TLS/SCTP?
> >>>
> >> Because the way it is realized is by transporting SCTP on top of DTLS
> (as defined in draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-dtls-encaps) and
> >> transporting DTLS on top of TCP (defined in RFC 4571).
> >
> > I got this but DTLS is a mapping to use TLS with UDP because UDP is an
> unreliable datagram transport. If you use TCP, you
> > should use TLS. And rfc4571 is not a mapping of DTLS to TCP.
>
> The framing mechanism of RFC 4571 is used, with DTLS packets sent instead
> of RTP packets.
>
> Regards,
>
> Christer
>
>