Re: [MMUSIC] MTI: PT, RID, Both, or Neither?
Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Wed, 28 October 2015 01:50 UTC
Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 130AB1B3EF0 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 18:50:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OGiBPVPAJSYG for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 18:50:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yk0-x231.google.com (mail-yk0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c07::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E37D1B3EED for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 18:50:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ykek133 with SMTP id k133so56675501yke.2 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 18:50:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=zT+MJDDWdlFOmHZUh4gZ/WuMl2QNKxKAr1eP44ppKuk=; b=qxjcFTthHQJyt53mYDqn2i1XZhL6GiupmN9pFrlRVRr3vbRO0F70FtD93Q7az95ksY d+L0zwKfkZjKBd/I4VtO/KBTKUMXNY7Vm6mWZhz6eBTqy2g9pcoJWsouZT8HchJmTPsO TGPjrJ30BX7Y8h8/UoTTpqpxRiJ2uSCFP0Yz1/1gz2DzzaVuMfW9c6KBXFWVuanKC/SI ffVtVbIZTyz6blN9Pca3mn+uoruq0vhzjFkqbtNy/H9yAix1ayVZiGyllBn+wSvihn50 NbZ3v+jEHevCket/dT2uk9eP6JW62x5UKdnNW9qut5xB298XLn3r94Q1ka7Cku1d+smc wFZA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.13.230.201 with SMTP id p192mr27799927ywe.43.1445997019819; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 18:50:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.129.132.145 with HTTP; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 18:50:19 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <562E557E.4010509@nostrum.com>
References: <562E557E.4010509@nostrum.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 10:50:19 +0900
Message-ID: <CABkgnnXdZHdEEuiQTJnbafPqkmtFJfa1_nxeyKR7EtC0eYFNkw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mmusic/qYOW6U8pfjc5-Q0KtoHH35u93yc>
Cc: "mmusic@ietf.org" <mmusic@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] MTI: PT, RID, Both, or Neither?
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mmusic/>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 01:50:23 -0000
On 27 October 2015 at 01:31, Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> wrote: > 2. RID is mandatory to implement, mandatory to include in offer. PT is optional > to implement, and may be included alongside RID in an offer. I think that this is fine, though I could probably concede #4. If I'm correct, failure to negotiate here means that you don't get simulcast, which is not necessarily the end of the world. We could choose #4 in this draft and have a stronger requirement in WebRTC (acknowledging that logistical difficulties exist here).
- Re: [MMUSIC] MTI: PT, RID, Both, or Neither? Paul Kyzivat
- [MMUSIC] MTI: PT, RID, Both, or Neither? Adam Roach
- Re: [MMUSIC] MTI: PT, RID, Both, or Neither? Peter Thatcher
- Re: [MMUSIC] MTI: PT, RID, Both, or Neither? Martin Thomson