Re: [MMUSIC] Feedback requested on requirements

Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> Thu, 25 April 2013 19:46 UTC

Return-Path: <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E87F21F899E for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 12:46:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.17
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.17 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.079, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id McTD+gbO54Tk for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 12:46:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgw2.ericsson.se (mailgw2.ericsson.se [193.180.251.37]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1115E21F8976 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 12:46:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb25-b7f366d000004d10-49-5179881134bc
Received: from ESESSHC004.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.125]) by mailgw2.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 60.43.19728.11889715; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 21:46:26 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ESESSMB209.ericsson.se ([169.254.9.167]) by ESESSHC004.ericsson.se ([153.88.183.30]) with mapi id 14.02.0328.009; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 21:46:25 +0200
From: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
To: "'Dale R. Worley'" <worley@ariadne.com>
Thread-Topic: [MMUSIC] Feedback requested on requirements
Thread-Index: AQHOQdoCk0UK10QF00CYB+KA+npxHpjnMNzggAAjpsCAAAKkQA==
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 19:46:24 +0000
Message-ID: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C360971@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
References: <201304251725.r3PHPNPu3426177@shell01.TheWorld.com> <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C36072A@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se> <201304251935.r3PJZKXe3439225@shell01.TheWorld.com>
In-Reply-To: <201304251935.r3PJZKXe3439225@shell01.TheWorld.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [153.88.183.19]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFjrJLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+Jvra5QR2WgQWutxdTlj1ksXp4oc2Dy mLz/K7PHkiU/mQKYorhsUlJzMstSi/TtErgyLuxtYS9oY61oenmWuYHxC3MXIyeHhICJxLqP 09ghbDGJC/fWs3UxcnEICRxmlNh34SETSEJIYAmjxJ5JCl2MHBxsAhYS3f+0QcIiAtoSP1ac YQMJMwuoS1xdHAQSFgaqON9ykhmixFLi5vLzLBC2k8SWJTvBbBYBVYmTzyFO4BXwlVjf9Zwd Yu1OoE2PGsDWcgo4SCxf2gtmMwLd9v3UGjCbWUBc4taT+UwQNwtILNlzHuoXUYmXj/+xQtiK Eu1PGxgh6nUkFuz+xAZha0ssW/gaarGgxMmZT1gmMIrNQjJ2FpKWWUhaZiFpWcDIsoqRPTcx Mye93GgTIzA6Dm75rbqD8c45kUOM0hwsSuK8M6QqA4UE0hNLUrNTUwtSi+KLSnNSiw8xMnFw SjUwchuoquQ83ZR5RmbWwWlPl1d5aRfwX/vavfOQ7Lc33VzrdpusM3h8vrl12t1vS2wcX+St 7i9WC+XYdi1JjtlFVSZuRrh5D8PD96efHzlvXrcnqm6l055ZM15//n724ix1trAF6Ul23FtX bxMoYD63u8diY4jNVNvz2uej63qrf595k5B/JrpGR4mlOCPRUIu5qDgRAMxVyRhcAgAA
Cc: "mmusic@ietf.org" <mmusic@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] Feedback requested on requirements
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 19:46:28 -0000

Hi,

>>>   DES C7  In a session description, no endpoint of a transport
>>>      association may be used multiple times.
>>>
>>>   Such duplication is not defined by [RFC4566].  Some SBCs do not
>>>   support such duplication (ultimately, because it was not supported by
>>>   [RFC2327]), and they reject SDP specifying duplicated transport
>>>   association endpoints.  This desideratum was suggested by Cullen
>>>   Jennings.
>> 
>> I don't understand what is meant by this desiderata.
>
> "Don't specify the same address/port in two m= lines."

Well, we do that in bundle (in the second offer).

Regards,

Christer