IETF Logo Mail Archive

[MMUSIC] Fwd: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5939 (5042)

Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> Fri, 16 June 2017 16:14 UTC

Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C8161293E9 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Jun 2017 09:14:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.88
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.88 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MNn9SaKniN2Q for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Jun 2017 09:14:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 68D4D1294B7 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Jun 2017 09:13:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.1.63] (cpe-66-25-7-22.tx.res.rr.com [66.25.7.22]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id v5GGDvu3057367 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Jun 2017 11:13:57 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host cpe-66-25-7-22.tx.res.rr.com [66.25.7.22] claimed to be [10.0.1.63]
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_BC42ACBC-0AB4-421F-B4CD-368A0BDB9298"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Message-Id: <CE0D86C8-1055-4ADE-A7D5-B632C0A30900@nostrum.com>
References: <20170616160554.08D0EB80164@rfc-editor.org>
To: mmusic <mmusic@ietf.org>
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2017 11:13:55 -0500
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mmusic/rOv_qVEvhHYwf5FdE5j7LpGMKoM>
Subject: [MMUSIC] Fwd: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5939 (5042)
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mmusic/>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2017 16:14:03 -0000

Hi,

This seems correct to me on a quick scan, modulo the work around opportunistic srtp, which shouldn’t affect the erratum at this point. Thoughts?

Thanks!

Ben.

> Begin forwarded message:
> 
> From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
> Subject: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5939 (5042)
> Date: June 16, 2017 at 11:05:54 AM CDT
> To: fandreas@cisco.com, ben@nostrum.com, aamelnikov@fastmail.fm, adam@nostrum.com, bo.burman@ericsson.com, fandreas@cisco.com
> Cc: fluffy@iii.ca, mmusic@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
> 
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5939,
> "Session Description Protocol (SDP) Capability Negotiation".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5042
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Technical
> Reported by: Typo in example <fluffy@iii.ca>
> 
> Section: 4.2
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
> m=audio 59000 UDP/TLS/RTP/AVP 98
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> m=audio 59000 UDP/TLS/RTP/SAVP 98
> 
> Notes
> -----
> The example missed an S in the mine type. The list of allowed types is at https://www.iana.org/assignments/sdp-parameters/sdp-parameters.xhtml#sdp-parameters-2 and UDP/TLS/RTP/AVP  is not a registered device. Because this is over TLS, it is a SRTP (not RTP) and should use SAVP not AVP.
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC5939 (draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-capability-negotiation-13)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Session Description Protocol (SDP) Capability Negotiation
> Publication Date    : September 2010
> Author(s)           : F. Andreasen
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Multiparty Multimedia Session Control RAI
> Area                : Real-time Applications and Infrastructure
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email