From: "DRAGE, Keith (Keith)" <keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com>
To: "mmusic@ietf.org" <mmusic@ietf.org>, "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>,
 "clue@ietf.org" <clue@ietf.org>, "dispatch@ietf.org" <dispatch@ietf.org>,
 "avt@ietf.org" <avt@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Taxonomy
Thread-Index: Ac6CNDlORSwpM9rIQtax1T6pBvHv5gAACsrAACo7ARA=
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 11:06:48 +0000
Message-ID: <949EF20990823C4C85C18D59AA11AD8B06B7FA@FR712WXCHMBA11.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] Taxonomy
Precedence: list

Breaking my own rule about cross posting...

Just wanted to add is that this document would not be retrospective, i.e. w=
e would not start rewriting the existing published RFCs to take into accoun=
t the new terminology.

The expectation however is that documents going forward from other working =
groups would use the new terminology rather than other terms.=20

Obviously how this is handled is up to the individual working groups, but u=
sing the new terminology will be the only good way of making your results u=
nderstandable outside your specific field.

So that is why your review and input is important.

Regards

Keith

> -----Original Message-----
> From: DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
> Sent: 16 July 2013 15:58
> To: mmusic@ietf.org; rtcweb@ietf.org; clue@ietf.org; dispatch@ietf.org;
> avt@ietf.org
> Subject: FW: Taxonomy
>=20
> Extensive cross-post do not reply to this email.
>=20
> For information. We do expect participation input from all the listed
> working groups (and possibly more).
>=20
> Keith
>=20
> -----Original Message-----
> From: avtext-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:avtext-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
> Of DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
> Sent: 16 July 2013 15:53
> To: avtext@ietf.org
> Subject: [avtext] Taxonomy
>=20
> (As AVTEXT WG cochair)
>=20
> The latest version of the RTP taxonomy draft has been submitted.
>=20
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lennox-raiarea-rtp-grouping-
> taxonomy/
>=20
> This document was allocated to AVTEXT by DISPATCH, and we have created a
> milestone for it in AVTEXT.
>=20
> This draft is not yet a working group document.
>=20
> We do expect to spend some significant meeting time discussing the
> contents in the AVTEXT meeting in Berlin, so please start raising your
> issues on the AVTEXT list.
>=20
> Additionally, if there are counter proposals existing that the AVTEXT
> chairs would not otherwise be aware of, then please identify them to the
> AVTEXT chairs / list.
>=20
> Regards
>=20
> Keith
> _______________________________________________
> avtext mailing list
> avtext@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avtext