Re: [MMUSIC] [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-mmusic-dtls-sdp-27

Christer Holmberg <> Fri, 28 July 2017 23:07 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EA9C131BFE; Fri, 28 Jul 2017 16:07:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.221
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.221 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2zpmKbeeig1X; Fri, 28 Jul 2017 16:07:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C7EC131D1E; Fri, 28 Jul 2017 16:07:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb25-607ff70000001eeb-57-597bc39a0c05
Received: from (Unknown_Domain []) by (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 3B.28.07915.A93CB795; Sat, 29 Jul 2017 01:07:07 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ([]) by ([]) with mapi id 14.03.0352.000; Sat, 29 Jul 2017 01:07:06 +0200
From: Christer Holmberg <>
To: Paul Kyzivat <>, "" <>
CC: General Area Review Team <>, IETF MMUSIC WG <>
Thread-Topic: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-mmusic-dtls-sdp-27
Thread-Index: AQHTB0VTgKnrsM/ZrUePhRU1wUhw6qJp3c2g
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2017 23:07:05 +0000
Message-ID: <>
References: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFmpikeLIzCtJLcpLzFFi42KZGbHdT3f24epIg2uHWSx23N3BZnH11WcW i6nLH7NYrNhwgNWBxePv+w9MHkuW/GQKYIrisklJzcksSy3St0vgyrjblFAwSbDiY5dAA+MN gS5GTg4JAROJjtttLF2MXBxCAkcYJd6/u8AE4SxmlHi9egdzFyMHB5uAhUT3P22QuIhAI6NE 4/T9zCDdzALBEnv3b2MEsYUFgiS+/l0JZosAxZsePoWyjSR+3exnB7FZBFQl9h3awA4yk1fA V+L/G1OQsJCAvcTkGzOZQGxOAQeJqwuvgJUzCohJfD+1hglilbjErSfzmSCOFpBYsuc8M4Qt KvHy8T9WCFtJYu3h7Swg45kFNCXW79KHaFWUmNL9EGwkr4CgxMmZT1gmMIrOQjJ1FkLHLCQd s5B0LGBkWcUoWpxanJSbbmSsl1qUmVxcnJ+nl5dasokRGDMHt/xW3cF4+Y3jIUYBDkYlHl7J 3dWRQqyJZcWVuYcYJTiYlUR43x8ECvGmJFZWpRblxxeV5qQWH2KU5mBREud13HchQkggPbEk NTs1tSC1CCbLxMEp1cBoypSZObHnv1Gm/vvpKyY/C3Z6mLpprouilNedxtbaWM+PmXO6ihPX vL+eZjczWnHh1Uvslffs2sPEGubr6yx/r8AmzJB3XlGAjbf++N5Vc6+aqnVPnD6HIalVY179 iz9rfzdLrny5N/L6vdawPWfPzXSQfjAhtYUj9fvVfRF3209L3dq8Tu2FEktxRqKhFnNRcSIA N0DqgpUCAAA=
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-mmusic-dtls-sdp-27
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2017 23:07:13 -0000

Hi Paul,

Thanks for the review. I'll fix references.



-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Kyzivat [] 
Sent: 28 July 2017 04:01
Cc: General Area Review Team <>rg>; IETF MMUSIC WG <>
Subject: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-mmusic-dtls-sdp-27

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. For more information, please see the FAQ at <​>.

Document: draft-ietf-mmusic-dtls-sdp-27
Reviewer: Paul Kyzivat
Review Date: 2017-07-07
IETF LC End Date: 2017-07-24
IESG Telechat date: 2017-08-15


This draft is basically ready for publication, but has nits that should be fixed before publication.

(These nits were reported by IdNits. I apologize for not noticing these during my Last Call review.)


Major: 0
Minor: 0
Nits:  2

(1) NIT: Unused Reference: 'RFC5245' is defined on line 1065, but no explicit reference was found in the text

This is now redundant because all the references in the text have been changed to draft-ietf-ice-rfc5245bis.

(2) NIT: Obsolete informational reference (is this intentional?): RFC 4572

This is now obsolete because it has been replaced by RFC8122. This draft should now be referencing that.