IETF Logo Mail Archive

[MMUSIC] Confirming consensus on way forward with Bundle

Ari Keränen <ari.keranen@ericsson.com> Mon, 15 April 2013 13:56 UTC

Return-Path: <ari.keranen@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39C3421F93CA for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 06:56:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.949
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.949 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EnfSbJlR9SMY for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 06:56:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgw2.ericsson.se (mailgw2.ericsson.se [193.180.251.37]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 314EA21F9370 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 06:56:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb25-b7f366d000004d10-5f-516c071da736
Received: from esessmw0256.eemea.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.125]) by mailgw2.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 1E.8B.19728.D170C615; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 15:56:45 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail.lmf.ericsson.se (153.88.115.8) by esessmw0256.eemea.ericsson.se (153.88.115.97) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.3.279.1; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 15:56:45 +0200
Received: from nomadiclab.lmf.ericsson.se (nomadiclab.lmf.ericsson.se [131.160.33.3]) by mail.lmf.ericsson.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB0A6238A; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 16:56:44 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from nomadiclab.lmf.ericsson.se (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nomadiclab.lmf.ericsson.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7665954AB9; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 16:56:44 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from As-MacBook-Air.local (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nomadiclab.lmf.ericsson.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id D857754957; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 16:56:43 +0300 (EEST)
Message-ID: <516C071B.5050204@ericsson.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 16:56:43 +0300
From: Ari Keränen <ari.keranen@ericsson.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130328 Thunderbird/17.0.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: mmusic <mmusic@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFprILMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+Jvra4se06gwcuLohbvL+haTF3+mMWB yWPK742sHkuW/GQKYIrisklJzcksSy3St0vgyji1dyJrwSz2iv/r7rM2ML5h7WLk4JAQMJH4 cUKji5ETyBSTuHBvPVsXIxeHkMApRokDbZdYQBJCAhsYJT43SUMkdjNKtM9rZYJw1jFK/Fi7 jgXCWQFUtfQTE0gLr4C2xMFpR5lBbBYBVYkNl36wgthsAvYSNydcZwexRQWSJZbuXMoGUS8o cXLmE7B1IgIyEns3bQbrFRawkJjw/CpYL7OArcSFOddZIGx5ie1v5zBD3K0mcfXcJmaIU1Ul rv57xTiBUWgWkrGzkLTPQtK+gJF5FSN7bmJmTnq50SZGYLAe3PJbdQfjnXMihxilOViUxHnD XS8ECAmkJ5akZqemFqQWxReV5qQWH2Jk4uCUamDUUXBp56ue0fVobaP7Mhm3S48u/WDclvwy lonrsjlvdl25/6nl7BKrNqy4rqU3K1i34d4KoXlTVmxw/F3imOB8SbgvJk/jIcMZManTRtM/ b5ntd+zTzV+C/52jDr8uWVzfnWg8n+vJMsETE4Vj1i2e1hHxc/vegz6nl6y6cHh+V1rfpane +5vklViKMxINtZiLihMBi5Mk8yQCAAA=
Subject: [MMUSIC] Confirming consensus on way forward with Bundle
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 13:56:47 -0000

At the Orlando meeting we had a call for consensus (see the minutes of 
the meeting at [1]) on using the current SDP bundle WG document [2] as 
the baseline of the bundle work. That is, using the offer/answer 
exchange as outlined in the draft (subject to clarifying comments made 
during the meeting) and using the port numbers as described in the draft.

The other option would be to not use this as the baseline but to 
continue discussing the alternative methods.

The show-of-hands at the meeting was around 30 for (going forward with 
the method described in the WG bundle doc) and 4 against. The MMUSIC 
chairs would like to confirm the consensus on this.

Those who were not present at the meeting to comment on this, please do 
so now.


Cheers,
Ari

[1] http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/86/minutes/minutes-86-mmusic
[2] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-bundle-negotiation-03

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email