IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [MMUSIC] NEED WG CONSENSUS: media-loopback is all-or-nothing

"Nikos Leontsinis" <nikosietf@gmail.com> Thu, 29 November 2012 14:09 UTC

Return-Path: <nikosietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A4C021F89DE for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 06:09:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_56=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7zxzKjHatdrW for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 06:09:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-we0-f172.google.com (mail-we0-f172.google.com [74.125.82.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC61321F89DC for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 06:09:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-we0-f172.google.com with SMTP id r3so4794888wey.31 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 06:09:06 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer :thread-index:content-language; bh=1uKlTocuIX+4IfK+w3phA1bpnwNX0erLXTrsUu0wq/0=; b=kDlgw+zy2lmmkgnATVtHQjAZVjSqdF/PTBrSiljOJfsYNL2EZ09wGrRHsLgQC6UFmO qFfZkA8x8LJkZGSi5Wz04UZhgPDYUTMatXw9BhSEYb8Ow/+qEvx0mowys/z7GWk98h74 3dN97LnHZtOOubPvZooS/MN1BFEnWXqw0roGJp4rjZyKGsE5+eItByxCq/YbJpMyTdbf D3VYD0+rlxEUaCEyDfodN/7XVqbV3/pOgLFKWYjepViakK7duYvEBfgi/V0xGyKKcxFe hPi0PFukuMnq2S/zF9g0iXNUvJfJ7bD7WojWoeAyvGaLsXPnmQ8wvEiEQrIhkqd/o84w q4vg==
Received: by 10.216.226.10 with SMTP id a10mr9450380weq.35.1354198145961; Thu, 29 Nov 2012 06:09:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from oteglobePC ([62.75.1.42]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g2sm2568328wiy.0.2012.11.29.06.09.02 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 29 Nov 2012 06:09:04 -0800 (PST)
From: Nikos Leontsinis <nikosietf@gmail.com>
To: 'Qin Wu' <bill.wu@huawei.com>, 'Hadriel Kaplan' <HKaplan@acmepacket.com>
References: <A444ACE8-4EDD-48DC-86C8-7CCBB40173CE@acmepacket.com> <C5E08FE080ACFD4DAE31E4BDBF944EB11326C452@xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com> <A6D6A7467A9A47D48B7505A482D852F0@china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <A6D6A7467A9A47D48B7505A482D852F0@china.huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 16:09:05 +0200
Message-ID: <004e01cdce3b$195f4a00$4c1dde00$@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQGmyTljJD8TQy67c5LTgwtkknPsqgKIjY67AosXBx2YJkZx4A==
Content-Language: el
Cc: mmusic@ietf.org, draft-ietf-mmusic-media-loopback@tools.ietf.org, 'Gonzalo Camarillo' <gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] NEED WG CONSENSUS: media-loopback is all-or-nothing
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 14:09:08 -0000

No for scalability reasons

/nikos

-----Original Message-----
From: mmusic-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mmusic-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Qin Wu
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 2:54 AM
To: Hadriel Kaplan
Cc: mmusic@ietf.org; draft-ietf-mmusic-media-loopback@tools.ietf.org;
Gonzalo Camarillo
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] NEED WG CONSENSUS: media-loopback is all-or-nothing

No,
I see it will be more flexible to allow some being looped back while some
not.

Regards!
-Qin
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <fluffy@cisco.com>
To: "Hadriel Kaplan" <HKaplan@acmepacket.com>
Cc: <mmusic@ietf.org>; <draft-ietf-mmusic-media-loopback@tools.ietf.org>;
"Gonzalo Camarillo" <gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com>
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 11:43 AM
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] NEED WG CONSENSUS: media-loopback is all-or-nothing


> 
> no
> 
> 
> On Nov 20, 2012, at 11:16 , Hadriel Kaplan <HKaplan@acmepacket.com> wrote:
> 
>> Howdy,
>> during IESG review of the media-loopback draft, a discussion arose
regarding the language around indicating media-loopback support per media
description (i.e., per m-line), in sections 3.1 and 3.2.
>> 
>> My interpretation/understanding was we were requiring ALL m-lines to
indicate media-loopback; in other words it's an all-or-nothing in both the
offer+answer, and either every media stream is looped back, or none are.
However the text currently doesn't make this clear, and it could be argued
either way, with pro's/con's either way too; so I'd like the WG's consensus
on whether it should in fact be an all-or-none approach, or not.
>> 
>> Please respond to this email by **Tuesday, December 4th** with a "YES" if
the draft should mandate ALL media be looped-back, or "NO" if it should
allow a hybrid approach of some streams being looped while others are not.
>> 
>> For reference, the draft is here:
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mmusic-media-loopback-24
>> 
>> -hadriel
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> mmusic mailing list
>> mmusic@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mmusic mailing list
> mmusic@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic
_______________________________________________
mmusic mailing list
mmusic@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email