Re: [MMUSIC] Draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc4566bis-05: session-level attributes

Yes, I agree that is the intent of the existing wording. Adding an example for the specific example you provided would help make this even more clear.

Cheers,
Charles

> -----Original Message-----
> From: mmusic-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mmusic-bounces@ietf.org] On
> Behalf Of Brett Tate
> Sent: Monday, August 06, 2012 8:14 AM
> To: mmusic@ietf.org
> Subject: [MMUSIC] Draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc4566bis-05: session-level attributes
> 
> Draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc4566bis-05 section 5 indicates the following.
> 
> "In general, session-level values are the default for all media
>  unless overridden by an equivalent media-level value."
> 
> "The connection ("c=") and attribute ("a=") information in the
>  session-level section applies to all the media of that session unless
>  overridden by connection information or an attribute of the same name
>  in the media description.  For instance, in the example below, each
>  media behaves as if it were given a "recvonly" attribute."
> 
> If the attributes are related but with different names (such as "inactive" and
> "sendrecv"), does the attribute at the media-level have precedence over
> the value at the session-level?  If so, I recommend that the draft be updated
> to clarify the topic.
> 
> Thanks,
> Brett
> 
> 
> This email is intended solely for the person or entity to which it is
> addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged information.  If
> you are not the intended recipient and have received this email in error,
> please notify BroadSoft, Inc. immediately by replying to this message, or by
> sending an email to helpdesk@broadsoft.com, and destroy all copies of this
> message, along with any attachment, prior to reading, distributing or
> copying it.
> _______________________________________________
> mmusic mailing list
> mmusic@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic