Re: [MMUSIC] BUNDLE/SDP : ISSUE#3: Should BUNDLE deal with DECLARATIVE SDP ?

[Suhas Nandakumar <[e-mail]>]

Good point Harald. Thinking of it , I feel this question applies to all the
declarative usages of SDP attributes in the context of BUNDLE.

>From Christer's and your point, I feel the BUNDLE specification should
state it explicitly that only O/A procedures are supported for this
version. That way, we handle all the attributes that has declarative
semantics along with O/A or otherwise.

please let me know your thoughts.

Thanks
Suhas




On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 12:49 AM, Harald Alvestrand <[e-mail]> wrote:

> Could you expand "declaratively" for me here? If it means "stated, not
> negotiated", this is the same as for many attrs in the draft already. If it
> means "never used in offer/answer", I agree with Christer.
> 31. okt. 2013 05:52 skrev "Suhas Nandakumar" <[e-mail]>
> følgende:
>
> Hello All
>>
>>   Magnus raised an important question while analyzing  RFC6064 SDP
>> attributes related to RTSP SDP attributes for 3GPP.  Since these attributes
>> are declaratively used, SHOULD BUNDLE be dealing with specifying the
>> behavior in Non Offer/Answer Scenarios ?
>>
>> If the answer is NO, we can assign category to be NOT IMPACTED for these
>> attributes,
>>
>> If the answer is YES, i think there needs to be more discussions on
>> handling this scenario.
>>
>> Please let me know your thoughts.
>>
>>
>> Cheers
>> Suhas
>>
>