[MMUSIC] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-mmusic-data-channel-sdpneg-25: (with COMMENT)

Mirja Kühlewind via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Fri, 05 April 2019 16:18 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietf.org
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A87BC12051F; Fri, 5 Apr 2019 09:18:13 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: =?utf-8?q?Mirja_K=C3=BChlewind_via_Datatracker?= <noreply@ietf.org>
To: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-mmusic-data-channel-sdpneg@ietf.org, Bo Burman <bo.burman@ericsson.com>, mmusic-chairs@ietf.org, bo.burman@ericsson.com, mmusic@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.94.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: =?utf-8?q?Mirja_K=C3=BChlewind?= <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
Message-ID: <155448109368.10029.4766956503581760917.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2019 09:18:13 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mmusic/tIWo6CFSWnjNMwWpyCvz181Tj3I>
Subject: [MMUSIC] =?utf-8?q?Mirja_K=C3=BChlewind=27s_No_Objection_on_draf?= =?utf-8?q?t-ietf-mmusic-data-channel-sdpneg-25=3A_=28with_COMMENT=29?=
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mmusic/>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2019 16:18:14 -0000

Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-mmusic-data-channel-sdpneg-25: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mmusic-data-channel-sdpneg/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks for quickly addressing the comments from the TSV-ART review regarding
interactions with SCTP (and thanks Micheal T. for the review!)!

One minor, more editorial comment on max-time parameter:
draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-protocol says "This life-time starts when providing the
user message to the protocol stack.". While a reference to
draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-protocol is given respectively, I would recommend to
also clarify in this draft which time frame is meant given this time frame
includes and end-to-end delays.

As a side note: not sure it is necessary to expand IETF (Internet Engineering
Task Force) (see sec 5.2) in an IETF RFC but the RFC editor might tell you...