[MMUSIC] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-mmusic-data-channel-sdpneg-25: (with COMMENT)
Mirja Kühlewind via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Fri, 05 April 2019 16:18 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietf.org
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A87BC12051F; Fri, 5 Apr 2019 09:18:13 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Mirja Kühlewind via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-mmusic-data-channel-sdpneg@ietf.org, Bo Burman <bo.burman@ericsson.com>, mmusic-chairs@ietf.org, bo.burman@ericsson.com, mmusic@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.94.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Mirja Kühlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
Message-ID: <155448109368.10029.4766956503581760917.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2019 09:18:13 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mmusic/tIWo6CFSWnjNMwWpyCvz181Tj3I>
Subject: [MMUSIC] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-mmusic-data-channel-sdpneg-25: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mmusic/>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2019 16:18:14 -0000
Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-mmusic-data-channel-sdpneg-25: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mmusic-data-channel-sdpneg/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks for quickly addressing the comments from the TSV-ART review regarding interactions with SCTP (and thanks Micheal T. for the review!)! One minor, more editorial comment on max-time parameter: draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-protocol says "This life-time starts when providing the user message to the protocol stack.". While a reference to draft-ietf-rtcweb-data-protocol is given respectively, I would recommend to also clarify in this draft which time frame is meant given this time frame includes and end-to-end delays. As a side note: not sure it is necessary to expand IETF (Internet Engineering Task Force) (see sec 5.2) in an IETF RFC but the RFC editor might tell you...
- [MMUSIC] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-… Mirja Kühlewind via Datatracker
- Re: [MMUSIC] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on dr… Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: [MMUSIC] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on dr… Roni Even (A)
- Re: [MMUSIC] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on dr… Mirja Kuehlewind