Re: [MMUSIC] What should we do with the middleboxes draft (draft-ietf-mmusic-media-path-middleboxes) ?

"Hannes Tschofenig" <Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net> Wed, 19 June 2013 12:12 UTC

Return-Path: <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBF1621F9A33 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 05:12:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.114
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.114 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.027, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_HTML_ONLY=1.457, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cNdoW0gTUzoD for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 05:11:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.19]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F52F21F9A47 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 05:11:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 3capp-gmx-bs32.server.lan ([172.19.170.84]) by mrigmx.server.lan (mrigmx001) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0M0euW-1U2HFq04mU-00ut7I; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 14:11:48 +0200
Received: from [194.251.119.196] by 3capp-gmx-bs32.server.lan with HTTP; Wed Jun 19 14:11:48 CEST 2013
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <trinity-cc270c67-c2a1-40d3-b893-2ae74bb93a8e-1371643907833@3capp-gmx-bs32>
From: "Hannes Tschofenig" <Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net>
To: "Flemming Andreasen" <fandreas@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 14:11:47 +0200 (CEST)
Importance: normal
Sensitivity: Normal
In-Reply-To: <51BA44CC.6000607@cisco.com>
References: <51BA44CC.6000607@cisco.com>
X-UI-Message-Type: mail
X-Priority: 3
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:JRPP7RtjMO2jXR2WTWcUwrKz5sbFbH2ZctA5+qhSNKl Ct85QhNF75oDaFpeng3z2zBiHpgdEPagFC5sFy+6VI3Hs/Fljk soKsgmeRu5ZA76Qul7uF5MhJKE64Cjb2+2oK/4VwifZr6DiamE imD4auM+vH7KLY3crVLtA3kWUvIqJraLlQJSIP5RZvgwJryznn AsqyoZJiL2ofgoArxnZ+AphnAD3f/x/Ej2yuQd7k6vI0a5lfxA 3Mmxuq7ZednNj/0JBiLJLtea9onlKBG4pQc3nV9FJ2eH+Mae8j 67YPpo=
Cc: Ari Keranen <ari.keranen@ericsson.com>, mmusic <mmusic@ietf.org>, Hadriel Kaplan <HKaplan@acmepacket.com>, draft-ietf-mmusic-media-path-middleboxes@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] What should we do with the middleboxes draft (draft-ietf-mmusic-media-path-middleboxes) ?
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 12:12:04 -0000

Hi Flemming, 
 
I am still willing to continue and complete this work. 
 
Gonzalo and I had tried to reach out to Hadriel numerous times to better understand his review remarks but unfortunately without success. 
 
Ciao
Hannes
 
PS: Btw, the "significant concerns", as you called them, came from one person, Hadriel. 
 
 
Gesendet: Freitag, 14. Juni 2013 um 00:16 Uhr
Von: "Flemming Andreasen" <fandreas@cisco.com>
An: mmusic <mmusic@ietf.org>
Cc: "Ari Keranen" <ari.keranen@ericsson.com>om>, "Hadriel Kaplan" <HKaplan@acmepacket.com>om>, draft-ietf-mmusic-media-path-middleboxes@tools.ietf.org
Betreff: [MMUSIC] What should we do with the middleboxes draft (draft-ietf-mmusic-media-path-middleboxes) ?
Greetings MMUSIC

As noted previously (http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic/current/msg09368.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic/current/msg09368.html), we currently have a milestone for " Considerations for using SDP offer/answer with middleboxes" and we have a WG draft for that in the form of

    http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mmusic-media-path-middleboxes/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mmusic-media-path-middleboxes/

When we polled for interest in this work about 1 year ago (per the above thread), there was some indication of continued interest in the work, however there were also some (significant) concerns expressed with the draft itself (see e.g. most recent thread in http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic/current/msg10163.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic/current/msg10163.html). These concerns have existed for well over a year and we have seen very little discussion or active work trying to resolve them.

In lieu of the above, the chairs would like to ask the WG participants to

1) Indicate if you are in favor of continuing this work.

2) If you are willing to actively contribute to the work by either
a) Sign on as co-author, drive the open issues to resolution, and update the document accordingly
b) Actively contribute to discussion and resolution of open issues in the draft.

Please note, that if you answer "yes" to 2a or 2b, then you should assume that you *will* get called upon to deliver on that.

Also please note, that if we do not get sufficient positive responses to both 1 and 2 above, then our plan is to remove the milestone and abandon the WG draft.

Thanks

-- Ari & Flemming (MMUSIC co-chairs)