Re: [MMUSIC] Notes from Orlando human language draft discussion

[Gunnar Hellstrom <[e-mail]>]

On 2013-03-16 20:54, Hadriel Kaplan wrote:
> What's the use-case when the two directions are not identical?  I.e., when does it make sense to receive Latin but send Swahili for the same media?
> I ask because this separation complicates things quite a bit in code/testing/error-handling, obviously.
Examples are:

1. Deaf-blind person who want to use sign language in video out, but 
cannot see it in reception and therefore declare language in video only 
for send video.
( also declaring preference for reading text and acceptance for typing 
text )

2. Hard-of-hearing person who want to talk in audio channel, but cannot 
hear answers , and therefore declare languge for audio only in send audio
( also declaring preference for reading text and acceptance for typing 
text )

3. Person with speech disabilities who want to hear in audio channel, 
but cannot use audio for talking
( also declaring preference for typing text and acceptance for reading 
text )

By the way, here we have a tricky case:
4. Person with speech disabilities who want to hear in audio channel, 
and talks unclearly, so that he want a speech relay service to listen to 
the call and clarify what got hard to understand for the other party.
Maybe that service needs to be requested with an explicit service 
request instead of language and modality matching?

  /Gunnar