Re: [MMUSIC] MMUSIC Working Group Virtual Interim Meeting, May 23, 2013

[Ari Keränen <[e-mail]>]

Whether we can have the f2f is still open too (the proposed date seems 
to collide with the WebRTC expo at Atlanta). We're working on figuring 
out possibilities for both a new virtual and/or f2f.


Cheers,
Ari

On 5/17/13 4:54 PM, Mary Barnes wrote:
> Thanks.  I'm also assuming then that there is no longer a potential
> f2f interim meeting in the plans (as was suggested in the announcement
> of the May 23rd interim)?
>
> Mary.
>
> On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 4:31 PM, Ari Keränen <[e-mail]> wrote:
>> Hi Mary,
>>
>> Yes, we are planning another interim for this discussion. Scheduling for one
>> has turned out to be quite hard due to various constraints, but we're
>> working on it.
>>
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Ari
>>
>>
>> On 5/16/13 11:31 PM, Mary Barnes wrote:
>>>
>>> Are there plans to schedule another virtual interim where the various
>>> plans can be discussed?
>>>
>>> On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Ari Keränen <[e-mail]>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> All,
>>>>
>>>> Since it seems that many of the key draft authors of the Plan A vs. Plan
>>>> B
>>>> discussion are unable to attend the virtual interim at the planned time,
>>>> we
>>>> have decided to focus at this interim on the open issues in the Bundle
>>>> draft.
>>>>
>>>> For details please read the current Bundle draft:
>>>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-bundle-negotiation-03
>>>>
>>>> Also see the latest Bundle threads on the MMUSIC mailing list. Christer
>>>> will
>>>> provide a more detailed list of issues to discuss.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Ari & Flemming (MMUSIC co-chairs)
>>>>
>>>> On 5/9/13 9:02 PM, IESG Secretary wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Greetings
>>>>>
>>>>> This is to announce a virtual interim meeting for the MMUSIC Working
>>>>> Group to take place on Thursday, May 23rd, from 7:00 am - 10:00 am
>>>>> Pacific Time. The goal of this meeting is to come to a resolution on the
>>>>> so-called "Plan A" or "Plan B" approach related to SDP signaling needed
>>>>> by RTCWeb, CLUE, etc. (i.e. do we have potentially lots of "m=" lines
>>>>> or very few "m=" lines and to what extent is there sub-negotation and
>>>>> signaling at the SSRC level).
>>>>>
>>>>> A more detailed agenda and logistics will be sent out separately. For
>>>>> now, people should take a close look at the following two drafts:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-roach-rtcweb-plan-a-00.txt
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-uberti-rtcweb-plan-00.txt
>>>>>
>>>>> You may also want to look at
>>>>> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-roach-rtcweb-glareless-add-00.txt
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>
>>>>> -- Ari & Flemming (MMUSIC co-chairs)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> PS: We are currently also considering having a physical interim meeting
>>>>> the week of June 24th, likely on the US West Coast. We will await the
>>>>> outcome of the virtual interim meeting before making a decision on this
>>>>> but wanted to give people a heads-up for now.
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> mmusic mailing list
>>>>> [e-mail]
>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> mmusic mailing list
>>>> [e-mail]
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic
>>
>>