Re: [MMUSIC] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-mmusic-ice-sip-sdp-37: (with COMMENT)

Heather Flanagan <rse@rfc-editor.org> Wed, 07 August 2019 21:54 UTC

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
From: Heather Flanagan <rse@rfc-editor.org>
In-Reply-To: <b5abdd85-05b9-01e2-8988-cacd79ae1003@nostrum.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2019 14:54:38 -0700
Cc: Flemming Andreasen <fandreas@cisco.com>, Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>, Mirja Kuehlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-mmusic-ice-sip-sdp@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mmusic-ice-sip-sdp@ietf.org>, "mmusic-chairs@ietf.org" <mmusic-chairs@ietf.org>, "mmusic@ietf.org" <mmusic@ietf.org>, "jdrosen@jdrosen.net" <jdrosen@jdrosen.net>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <17F1DCE7-D1FD-4B80-B793-A0DC84494DFA@rfc-editor.org>
References: <156502552845.24515.11157901358870690278.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <HE1PR07MB31613F486F6B67B1A1F0453093DA0@HE1PR07MB3161.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <747b0dc1-5a12-3751-c82b-20a03d14015a@cisco.com> <b5abdd85-05b9-01e2-8988-cacd79ae1003@nostrum.com>
To: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mmusic/xDGaTDcHsMkIg5SE_C998WczWgs>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-mmusic-ice-sip-sdp-37: (with COMMENT)
Precedence: list


> On Aug 7, 2019, at 11:52 AM, Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> wrote:
> 
> On 8/7/19 07:48, Flemming Andreasen wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> On 8/5/19 2:44 PM, Christer Holmberg wrote:
>>> Hi Mirja,
>>> 
>>> Thank You for the review! Please see inline.
>>> 
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> COMMENT:
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> 
>>>> 1) First I have a processing question for the IESG (and maybe the RFC editor) but it might be just me not knowing this:
>>>> As I understand it, RFC5245 was spilt up into RFC8445 and this document, however, I find it a bot odd that both documenst
>>>> obsolete RFC5245. Is that what we usually do? Did we have this case before? Is that the right thing to do?
>>> That's a good question. I hope the chairs and/or the AD can give some guidance.
>>> 
>> I'm not sure either. Maybe Adam knows ? 
> 
> 
> I don't think there's any issue with the situation. I've copied Heather to see if she sees any issues with two documents obsoleting the same one.
> 

It’s not a problem, though I would expect that RFC8445 and draft-ietf-mmusic-ice-sip-sdp explain how/why they each obsolete RFC5245. 

-Heather

[MMUSIC] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-… Mirja Kühlewind via Datatracker
Re: [MMUSIC] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on dr… Roman Shpount
Re: [MMUSIC] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on dr… Christer Holmberg
Re: [MMUSIC] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on dr… Christer Holmberg
Re: [MMUSIC] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on dr… Mirja Kuehlewind
Re: [MMUSIC] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on dr… Mirja Kuehlewind
Re: [MMUSIC] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on dr… Flemming Andreasen
Re: [MMUSIC] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on dr… Paul Kyzivat
Re: [MMUSIC] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on dr… Christer Holmberg
Re: [MMUSIC] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on dr… Adam Roach
Re: [MMUSIC] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on dr… Christer Holmberg
Re: [MMUSIC] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on dr… Paul Kyzivat
Re: [MMUSIC] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on dr… Heather Flanagan
Re: [MMUSIC] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on dr… Christer Holmberg
Re: [MMUSIC] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on dr… Suhas Nandakumar (snandaku)
Re: [MMUSIC] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on dr… Paul Kyzivat
Re: [MMUSIC] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on dr… Flemming Andreasen
Re: [MMUSIC] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on dr… Suhas Nandakumar