IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [MMUSIC] 10 BUNDLE questions: Questions on the SDP restrictions

Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> Thu, 25 April 2013 14:04 UTC

Return-Path: <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFCA921F961A for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 07:04:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.15
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.15 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.099, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ygkMxNs9-xRk for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 07:04:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgw1.ericsson.se (mailgw1.ericsson.se [193.180.251.45]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACB9421F960F for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 07:03:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb2d-b7f316d0000028db-74-517937cea8d6
Received: from ESESSHC023.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.125]) by mailgw1.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id AB.C6.10459.EC739715; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 16:03:58 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ESESSMB209.ericsson.se ([169.254.9.167]) by ESESSHC023.ericsson.se ([153.88.183.87]) with mapi id 14.02.0328.009; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 16:03:57 +0200
From: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
To: "mmusic@ietf.org" <mmusic@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [MMUSIC] 10 BUNDLE questions: Questions on the SDP restrictions
Thread-Index: Ac5BtetQA/tOGLtGSMCPJoJAl/DbRg==
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 14:03:58 +0000
Message-ID: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C35F453@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [153.88.183.20]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFprNLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+Jvre4588pAg4dHVCymLn/M4sDosWTJ T6YAxigum5TUnMyy1CJ9uwSujGdXOxgLPghU7H+9hbWBcYdAFyMnh4SAiUT39c9MELaYxIV7 69m6GLk4hAQOM0p0rbsPlhASWMIoMe8ufxcjBwebgIVE9z9tkLCIgLrE1709zCC2sICPxNqX u9gh4r4SPec7GCFsPYmzp3aBjWERUJXoWfsYrIYXqOb8h92sIDYj0N7vp9aA1TALiEvcejIf 6h4BiSV7zjND2KISLx//Y4WwFSWuTl/OBHIOs4CmxPpd+hCtihJTuh9CjReUODnzCcsERuFZ SKbOQuiYhaRjFpKOBYwsqxjZcxMzc9LLDTcxAgP44JbfujsYT50TOcQozcGiJM47XaoyUEgg PbEkNTs1tSC1KL6oNCe1+BAjEwenVAOj5EebW+Vlqtq/phd+U1n072D/sQVX156+U92arjdz dc38arHt7q4aKSYvJthsPrHLsnBW5SvbBy84jQMk83Mu7T2744WoT5+x6OGd259qPN+1y01t QY/h16S5v44X9M10qVqYpD5ze3fiNudWEb+654e7HBsKl9y/lL/uyL+A/Q8XLFDWruJ+psRS nJFoqMVcVJwIACzsmxUuAgAA
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] 10 BUNDLE questions: Questions on the SDP restrictions
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 14:04:00 -0000

Hi,

>4. From 6.1, list 1 - are conditions 2, 5, 7 really necessary? (MUST use same c=, add rtcp-mux, same a=fingerprint)

There were some questions on why we have certain restrictions in list 1, as values can be "sorted out" in the second offer (where list 2 applies).

Regarding the same c=, if someone really sees a need for sending the first offer with different values, I guess we could discuss it. My suggestion is to keep the restriction in list 1. But, if someone OBJECTS to this, please indicate so.

Regarding "a=rtcp-mux", my suggestion is that we should mandate it for BUNDLE, and I have heard others saying the same. But, if someone OBJECTS to this, please indicate so.

Regarding "a=fingerprint", the opinion seems to be that there would be no idea using different values. But, if someone OBJECTS to this, please indicate so.


>5. From 6.1, list 2 - is condition 6 right? Why would we use different SDES keys for a single RTP session?

As people have indicated, it prevents a two-time pad attack, and that is also the only reason I can think of. My suggestion is to keep the restriction in list 1 and 2. But, if someone OBJECTS to this, please indicate so.


> 6. If you start with a m= line with one SDES config (e.g. 32-bit MAC), and then BUNDLE with another SDES line with a different (non overlapping) SDES config (e.g. 80-bit MAC), what happens? (assume fail)

People have indicated that this would be a failure, and I have seen no one indicate otherwise. But, if someone OBJECTS to this, please indicate so.

Regards,

Christer

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email