Re: [MMUSIC] Issue #4 from Magnus on draft-ietf-mmusic-media-loopback-16

Hi Miguel,
I knew you had also posted comments but I was planning to address Magnus' first and then your's, but I see now there is some overlap.

With regard to title, would this be ok:

"A Media Loopback Mechanism for Real-time Transport Protocol (RTP) and Extension for SDP"

-hadriel

On Nov 22, 2011, at 1:43 AM, Miguel A. Garcia wrote:

> Hi:
> 
> In my comments posted in this mail:
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic/current/msg08958.html
> 
> I suggested to rename the draft to: "An extension to SDP and RTP for media loopback".
> 
> While I don't care much of the exact words, I think the terms "SDP", "RTP" and "media loopback" need all be in the title of the document. Your proposal misses "SDP", so, if you add it, I will agree.
> 
> BR,
> 
>      Miguel
> 
> On 21/11/2011 19:57, Hadriel Kaplan wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Oct 21, 2011, at 5:25 AM, Magnus Westerlund wrote:
>> 
>>> 4. Title: I think the title is indicating that this is only an SDP
>>> solution, but it clearly contains the considerations needed for the
>>> RTP/RTCP part also. I think it should reflect that it is a solution for
>>> RTP transported media loopback including SDP signalling.
>> 
>> I propose the following title:
>> "A Media Loopback Mechanism for Real-time Transport Protocol (RTP)"
>> 
>> Does anyone object?
>> 
>> -hadriel
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> mmusic mailing list
>> mmusic@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic
>> 
> 
> -- 
> Miguel A. Garcia
> +34-91-339-3608
> Ericsson Spain