IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [MMUSIC] Partial Offer/Partial Answer draft

Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> Thu, 17 October 2013 18:28 UTC

Return-Path: <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC1D811E813F for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Oct 2013 11:28:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.397
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.397 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.203, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OawtBrnIwYzQ for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Oct 2013 11:28:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shaman.nostrum.com (nostrum-pt.tunnel.tserv2.fmt.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f03:267::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C54D711E81A2 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Oct 2013 11:28:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from orochi.roach.at (99-152-145-110.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [99.152.145.110]) (authenticated bits=0) by shaman.nostrum.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id r9HISaI4023548 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 17 Oct 2013 13:28:37 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from adam@nostrum.com)
Message-ID: <52602C4F.2070809@nostrum.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 13:28:31 -0500
From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
References: <525C7537.4080209@nostrum.com> <525DB14E.8060804@alum.mit.edu> <5260101F.409@nostrum.com> <526022DF.6070003@alum.mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <526022DF.6070003@alum.mit.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Received-SPF: pass (shaman.nostrum.com: 99.152.145.110 is authenticated by a trusted mechanism)
Cc: mmusic@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] Partial Offer/Partial Answer draft
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 18:28:44 -0000

On 10/17/13 12:48, Paul Kyzivat wrote:
> My thinking was that when grouping is being used for multiple 
> purposes, each might use its own mid values. 

Again, that's not really supported by any of the text in RFC5888.

/a

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status