IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [MMUSIC] Feedback requested on requirements

worley@ariadne.com (Dale R. Worley) Thu, 18 April 2013 20:47 UTC

Return-Path: <worley@shell01.TheWorld.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF08021F935D for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 13:47:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.705
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.705 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.275, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB=0.619]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 15o42vIMCjX8 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 13:47:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from TheWorld.com (pcls5.std.com [192.74.137.145]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0268021F9350 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 13:47:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shell.TheWorld.com (svani@shell01.theworld.com [192.74.137.71]) by TheWorld.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r3IKlbeV032477 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 16:47:39 -0400
Received: from shell01.TheWorld.com (localhost.theworld.com [127.0.0.1]) by shell.TheWorld.com (8.13.6/8.12.8) with ESMTP id r3IKlaVA2963467 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 16:47:37 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from worley@localhost) by shell01.TheWorld.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id r3IKlaCt2959062; Thu, 18 Apr 2013 16:47:36 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 16:47:36 -0400
Message-Id: <201304182047.r3IKlaCt2959062@shell01.TheWorld.com>
From: worley@ariadne.com
Sender: worley@ariadne.com
To: mmusic@ietf.org
In-reply-to: <516E5575.1050704@ericsson.com> (magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com)
References: <201304161549.r3GFnui72796125@shell01.TheWorld.com> <516E5575.1050704@ericsson.com>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] Feedback requested on requirements
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mmusic>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 20:47:46 -0000

> From: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>

> >    DES F12  Bundling must not interfere with ICE usage, and in
> >       particular, ICE's ability to negotiate both IPv4 and IPv6
> >       addresses simultaneously.
> 
> I believe the intention is right here, but I stumble on the word
> "negotiate". To my understanding the usage of two address families are
> not really negotiated. It is more, here are my candidates, create
> candidate pairs within each family and then follow the check-board
> algorithm.

The object of the verb "negotiate" is "addresses": "ICE negotiates
addresses".  There may be a better word than "negotiate" for what ICE
does.

In any case, Andy Hutton expressed concern that the bundling mechanism
should not limit dual-stack implementations in any way, so I included
this desideratum.

Dale

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email