[MMUSIC] normative dependencies in draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-bundle-negotiation

Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca> Wed, 08 February 2017 21:13 UTC

Return-Path: <fluffy@iii.ca>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A74AE1294C7 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 13:13:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.788
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.788 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-1.887, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yOVNqbVuiLEX for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 13:13:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp98.iad3a.emailsrvr.com (smtp98.iad3a.emailsrvr.com [173.203.187.98]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C8CE1294B1 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 13:13:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp29.relay.iad3a.emailsrvr.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp29.relay.iad3a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id D4DE9251EE; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 16:13:24 -0500 (EST)
X-Auth-ID: fluffy@iii.ca
Received: by smtp29.relay.iad3a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: fluffy-AT-iii.ca) with ESMTPSA id 8C2F624F86; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 16:13:24 -0500 (EST)
X-Sender-Id: fluffy@iii.ca
Received: from [10.24.4.137] ([UNAVAILABLE]. [128.107.241.189]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA) by 0.0.0.0:587 (trex/5.7.12); Wed, 08 Feb 2017 16:13:24 -0500
From: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2017 13:13:23 -0800
Message-Id: <A512B338-167A-4711-813A-2159A9A80B04@iii.ca>
To: mmusic <mmusic@ietf.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mmusic/zDXB94Rz7UlRGUtxKqfvtiFAV7w>
Cc: RTCWeb IETF <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: [MMUSIC] normative dependencies in draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-bundle-negotiation
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mmusic/>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2017 21:13:37 -0000

Looking at draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-bundle-negotiation, it seems that it would be fine to normatively depend on RFC 5245 instead of ietf-mmusic-ice-sip-sdp. It does not rely on any changes in made from 4245 to ice-sip-sdp. 

We don't want JSEP to normatively depend on ietf-mmusic-ice-sip-sdp since that is not needed. Could you change draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-bundle-negotiation to not normatively depend on ietf-mmusic-ice-sip-sdp?

Thanks