Re: [MMUSIC] H.264 SVC and BUNDLE

Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> Sat, 15 September 2012 01:47 UTC

Message-ID: <5053DE25.5070300@alvestrand.no>
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 18:47:17 -0700
From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120827 Thunderbird/15.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
References: <503E0B63.3020708@ericsson.com>, , <E17CAD772E76C742B645BD4DC602CD8106A9810E@NAHALD.us.int.genesyslab.com>, <7F2072F1E0DE894DA4B517B93C6A05853409FF2F4C@ESESSCMS0356.eemea.ericsson.se>, <035101cd8636$3b654160$b22fc420$@com>, <03FBA798AC24E3498B74F47FD082A92F177393B8@US70UWXCHMBA04.zam.alcatel-lucent.com>, <503FCAA1.5080500@alvestrand.no> <BLU002-W2102260755F0099C2AA98E93A70@phx.gbl>, <503FDBA1.9000003@alvestrand.no> <BLU002-W229ACEE3EA717C4E272462393A60@phx.gbl> <504055EF.5070300@alvestrand.no> <7F2072F1E0DE894DA4B517B93C6A0585340A3DCD92@ESESSCMS0356.eemea.ericsson.se> <50407CE5.3080407@alvestrand.no> <7F2072F1E0DE894DA4B517B93C6A0585340A3DCE65@ESESSCMS0356.eemea.ericsson.se>
In-Reply-To: <7F2072F1E0DE894DA4B517B93C6A0585340A3DCE65@ESESSCMS0356.eemea.ericsson.se>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "mmusic@ietf.org" <mmusic@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] H.264 SVC and BUNDLE
Precedence: list

On 08/31/2012 03:30 AM, Christer Holmberg wrote:
> Hi,
>   
>>> One question is of course whether we are going to move ahead with the m=bundle proposal. In that case, I guess the m=video lines
>>> would look like they do today, and the question is how we describe the multiplexed SVC within the m=bundle line.
>> The SVC session is simple - just use the same lines (except rtpmap H.264/ -> mime-type-map video/H.264, or whatever we decide to call it).
> Correct.
>
> And, as you indicate, if we move ahead with the m=bundle alternative, we need to decide whether we will use the rtpmap attribute, or whether we need something else. But, that's a separate thread :)
>
>> The MVC additional session can't be bundled, so it remains outside the BUNDLE line.
> Why do you think it can't be bundled? Because it can't use the same port, and/or because it uses multiple RTP sessions?
Because if it was using the same RTP session, it would be SST. (not SVC, 
sorry).

Re: [MMUSIC] H.264 SVC and BUNDLE Bernard Aboba
Re: [MMUSIC] H.264 SVC and BUNDLE Harald Alvestrand
Re: [MMUSIC] H.264 SVC and BUNDLE Christer Holmberg
Re: [MMUSIC] H.264 SVC and BUNDLE Harald Alvestrand
Re: [MMUSIC] H.264 SVC and BUNDLE Christer Holmberg
Re: [MMUSIC] H.264 SVC and BUNDLE Harald Alvestrand
Re: [MMUSIC] H.264 SVC and BUNDLE Cullen Jennings (fluffy)