Re: [MMUSIC] 1-week WGLC on Section 7.6 (3PCC Considerations) in draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc8843bis-06
Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com> Wed, 01 December 2021 21:37 UTC
Return-Path: <roman@telurix.com>
X-Original-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E53EA3A0B5E for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Dec 2021 13:37:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=telurix.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id v4iVsGgVtxD8 for <mmusic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Dec 2021 13:37:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qk1-x736.google.com (mail-qk1-x736.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::736]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D40B23A0B64 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Dec 2021 13:37:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qk1-x736.google.com with SMTP id m192so32629975qke.2 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Wed, 01 Dec 2021 13:37:10 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=telurix.com; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=CRu79LiSIt3QSFSgpOKj2aUkyjHNrSwwEWvhohiGe4k=; b=eA3FxAYu9co0tfHOSSvPjpBgrSHQNvQWg5q3v1PHCIHzXtOa0qNlvHtRedZZMYvoEj JvO3msI7q+6/6kzIIiGkwiT1trYySuNiwZzrC1ePDB5CGfZc73XOc+GJcDh2g2R+SXAZ Wkno6xE4+AtE1FPlK015iXkffjsziiuKEpznQ=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=CRu79LiSIt3QSFSgpOKj2aUkyjHNrSwwEWvhohiGe4k=; b=D5GswN87GvxMyZOUk+T1CqqK8qSJG57vMXZXOI/vlfAT2YABhmDHvq7lYht+o9yGFB erKDuUMwXfutz5svV9NLo8UPIIzGt8ZxKoYwhlziVOFbq/SHTakkwMFZMt6daMFRTaL6 IEWm63YGNDLmsexdRQe8d8Ry8nAO1JVSddd6LAqePXMv/PJpjuMTSL6p8xJbEHDjSXOY jR9UL1LkP2f55dhelqeZZxIO1jibKaEerTyflCJOM2gN7GSsb1jWF8HiAuOfF4PS+xs8 bI2fXTuCxNzIdZg71TarDWZyk3tNwRT9Hoa3cwb3I/0u3ON5fHaFZp1eisihndnxs1h0 8rNA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM53034FSn0yX1JPuyzoP+g1VJB5swzPEdD5hZDq6jtcFH0h1VpERc U4gJMZ591vNtK7Tf8QVkP0+4w0PnL0V07Q==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyXsPpkIYBRdveP59aPZHdlzjDHO/nSMq0ZOOudTOG5VCYqaAEzIzwST1h4rX6LdJYIcrKNbw==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:998:: with SMTP id x24mr8976551qkx.117.1638394628478; Wed, 01 Dec 2021 13:37:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yb1-f173.google.com (mail-yb1-f173.google.com. [209.85.219.173]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d17sm503699qtx.96.2021.12.01.13.37.07 for <mmusic@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 01 Dec 2021 13:37:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-yb1-f173.google.com with SMTP id v203so67556685ybe.6 for <mmusic@ietf.org>; Wed, 01 Dec 2021 13:37:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a25:cc8e:: with SMTP id l136mr10069524ybf.293.1638394627234; Wed, 01 Dec 2021 13:37:07 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <443b55f8-9d42-6728-de87-36a8392aaa10@cisco.com> <HE1PR07MB4441163C03DA3FA9A88B0114939F9@HE1PR07MB4441.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <CAOLzse1JMd=re=96OQR1qD6wj_SJnwRdUGAzU69k4v=gr4LcvQ@mail.gmail.com> <HE1PR07MB44419673CDC9E5C1CD76F04593609@HE1PR07MB4441.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <CAOLzse3e0bmNwkz_2T6QvpQYs5Q3dqB8YnEoVQp=YRPhGP+6Vw@mail.gmail.com> <CAD5OKxs25qiRvvFZDzda2CWun3MAwZxz8WrGYJdDHEgdB1d0ng@mail.gmail.com> <HE1PR07MB44415ADB77F0EA6B8732DB2393619@HE1PR07MB4441.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <CAOLzse3yFO+iAWEeqrv_WZTZZi0xO3C3pGL+G13-59N4+kgj-A@mail.gmail.com> <HE1PR07MB44418958A9C748993B42342293649@HE1PR07MB4441.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <366a03d8-8228-9b90-7730-93146d628927@alum.mit.edu> <HE1PR07MB4441C740C1E7D1D2E33E81A893669@HE1PR07MB4441.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <CAD5OKxsF+r9f62C1F-VX2ijKTHFepUMJaaatn_SGc+7Eo5AxfQ@mail.gmail.com> <0da5c5e0-3379-7920-05a8-b959d65912a5@alum.mit.edu> <HE1PR07MB44419F390B8996EED8312BAB93669@HE1PR07MB4441.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <9f234db3-cb52-f8cf-3582-a652ecd01042@alum.mit.edu> <HE1PR07MB44411A325730FAB76A534A2693689@HE1PR07MB4441.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <HE1PR07MB44411A325730FAB76A534A2693689@HE1PR07MB4441.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
From: Roman Shpount <roman@telurix.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2021 16:36:56 -0500
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CAD5OKxtOf+brQpZ-3CQjbTO=ngWuU9+JHrwixSsd40tV6C03eA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAD5OKxtOf+brQpZ-3CQjbTO=ngWuU9+JHrwixSsd40tV6C03eA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
Cc: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>, "mmusic@ietf.org" <mmusic@ietf.org>, Justin Uberti <juberti@alphaexplorationco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000c2202d05d21c7928"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mmusic/zpJYmP24TN9XKBjMpQP_wtWGgDc>
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] 1-week WGLC on Section 7.6 (3PCC Considerations) in draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc8843bis-06
X-BeenThere: mmusic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiparty Multimedia Session Control Working Group <mmusic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mmusic/>
List-Post: <mailto:mmusic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic>, <mailto:mmusic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2021 21:37:16 -0000
This works for me as well. I just want to make sure that the problem is described. Thank you, Christer. _____________ Roman Shpount On Wed, Dec 1, 2021 at 8:46 AM Christer Holmberg < christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> wrote: > Roman/Justin, can you live with the suggestion based on Paul's comment, > i.e., replace: > > "Therefore, the 3PCC controller SHOULD rewrite the subsequent BUNDLE > Offer into a valid > initial BUNDLE Offer, following the procedures in Section 7.2, before it > forwards the BUNDLE Offer to a UA. In the rewritten BUNDLE Offer the > 3PCC controller will set the port value to zero (and include an SDP > 'bundle-only' attribute) for each "m=" section within the BUNDLE group, > excluding the offerer-tagged "m=" section." > > ...with: > > "Therefore, the 3PCC controller SHOULD take actions to mitigate this > problem, e.g., by rewriting the subsequent BUNDLE offer into a valid > initial BUNDLE offer (Section 7.2), before it forwards the BUNDLE > offer to a UA." > > If not, please go into compromise mode and try to suggest something that > would make anyone happy. I really don't want the work to get delayed > because of this. > > The IMPORTANT thing is to point out the PROBLEM - one endpoint sends a > subsequent offer, and another endpoints expects an initial offer -and to > give an EXAMPLE on how it CAN be solved. It's fine if someone wants to > solve the problem in some other way, as long as it works... > > Regards, > > Christer > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: mmusic <mmusic-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Paul Kyzivat > Sent: tiistai 30. marraskuuta 2021 18.24 > To: mmusic@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] 1-week WGLC on Section 7.6 (3PCC Considerations) in > draft-ietf-mmusic-rfc8843bis-06 > > Christer, > > On 11/29/21 2:00 PM, Christer Holmberg wrote: > > Hi Paul, > > > > Since the issue is introduced by BUNDLE, I think we should say more > > than simply "the 3PCC has to do something". > > > > I am fine to change the current procedure from a SHOULD to an example, > > but I do think we should include some guidance. > > > > For example: > > > > "Therefore, the 3PCC controller needs to take actions to mitigate this > > problem, e.g., by rewriting the subsequent BUNDLE offer into a valid > > initial BUNDLE offer (Section 7.2), before it forwards the BUNDLE > > offer to a UA." > > > > (I have no strong opinion on whether we use "3GPP controller needs to" > > or "3GPP controller SHOULD".) > > That works for me. My problem with the earlier text was that it described > *a* solution as if it was *the* solution that would solve the problem, when > there are potential problems it doesn't solve. > > Changing it to be one example improves it. > > There could be a longer discussion about what kinds of things could go > wrong and how to mitigate each. But that may be overkill. > > Thanks, > Paul > > _______________________________________________ > mmusic mailing list > mmusic@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mmusic >
- [MMUSIC] 1-week WGLC on Section 7.6 (3PCC Conside… Flemming Andreasen
- Re: [MMUSIC] 1-week WGLC on Section 7.6 (3PCC Con… Roman Shpount
- Re: [MMUSIC] 1-week WGLC on Section 7.6 (3PCC Con… Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [MMUSIC] 1-week WGLC on Section 7.6 (3PCC Con… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [MMUSIC] 1-week WGLC on Section 7.6 (3PCC Con… Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [MMUSIC] 1-week WGLC on Section 7.6 (3PCC Con… Roman Shpount
- Re: [MMUSIC] 1-week WGLC on Section 7.6 (3PCC Con… Justin Uberti
- Re: [MMUSIC] 1-week WGLC on Section 7.6 (3PCC Con… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [MMUSIC] 1-week WGLC on Section 7.6 (3PCC Con… Justin Uberti
- Re: [MMUSIC] 1-week WGLC on Section 7.6 (3PCC Con… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [MMUSIC] 1-week WGLC on Section 7.6 (3PCC Con… Keith Drage
- Re: [MMUSIC] 1-week WGLC on Section 7.6 (3PCC Con… Justin Uberti
- Re: [MMUSIC] 1-week WGLC on Section 7.6 (3PCC Con… Roman Shpount
- Re: [MMUSIC] 1-week WGLC on Section 7.6 (3PCC Con… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [MMUSIC] 1-week WGLC on Section 7.6 (3PCC Con… Justin Uberti
- Re: [MMUSIC] 1-week WGLC on Section 7.6 (3PCC Con… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [MMUSIC] 1-week WGLC on Section 7.6 (3PCC Con… Roman Shpount
- Re: [MMUSIC] 1-week WGLC on Section 7.6 (3PCC Con… Justin Uberti
- Re: [MMUSIC] 1-week WGLC on Section 7.6 (3PCC Con… Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [MMUSIC] 1-week WGLC on Section 7.6 (3PCC Con… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [MMUSIC] 1-week WGLC on Section 7.6 (3PCC Con… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [MMUSIC] 1-week WGLC on Section 7.6 (3PCC Con… Roman Shpount
- Re: [MMUSIC] 1-week WGLC on Section 7.6 (3PCC Con… Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [MMUSIC] 1-week WGLC on Section 7.6 (3PCC Con… Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [MMUSIC] 1-week WGLC on Section 7.6 (3PCC Con… Flemming Andreasen
- Re: [MMUSIC] 1-week WGLC on Section 7.6 (3PCC Con… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [MMUSIC] 1-week WGLC on Section 7.6 (3PCC Con… Roman Shpount
- Re: [MMUSIC] 1-week WGLC on Section 7.6 (3PCC Con… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [MMUSIC] 1-week WGLC on Section 7.6 (3PCC Con… Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [MMUSIC] 1-week WGLC on Section 7.6 (3PCC Con… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [MMUSIC] 1-week WGLC on Section 7.6 (3PCC Con… Justin Uberti
- Re: [MMUSIC] 1-week WGLC on Section 7.6 (3PCC Con… Roman Shpount
- Re: [MMUSIC] 1-week WGLC on Section 7.6 (3PCC Con… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [MMUSIC] 1-week WGLC on Section 7.6 (3PCC Con… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [MMUSIC] 1-week WGLC on Section 7.6 (3PCC Con… Roman Shpount
- Re: [MMUSIC] 1-week WGLC on Section 7.6 (3PCC Con… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [MMUSIC] 1-week WGLC on Section 7.6 (3PCC Con… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [MMUSIC] 1-week WGLC on Section 7.6 (3PCC Con… Roman Shpount
- Re: [MMUSIC] 1-week WGLC on Section 7.6 (3PCC Con… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [MMUSIC] 1-week WGLC on Section 7.6 (3PCC Con… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [MMUSIC] 1-week WGLC on Section 7.6 (3PCC Con… Christer Holmberg