[MOBILE-IP] Private addresses
Raffaele Pellicciotta <pellicciotta@CORITEL.IT> Thu, 22 June 2000 16:08 UTC
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2000 18:08:47 +0200
From: Raffaele Pellicciotta <pellicciotta@CORITEL.IT>
Subject: [MOBILE-IP] Private addresses
To: MOBILE-IP@STANDARDS.NORTELNETWORKS.COM
X-Message-ID:
Message-ID: <20140418065037.2560.29772.ARCHIVE@ietfa.amsl.com>
Hi, I desire to have information about use of private addresses on Mobile IP!!!
What is its state of art?
Thanks a lot,
Raffaele
----- End Included Message -----
----------
X-Sun-Data-Type: default
X-Sun-Data-Name: draft_update.privaddr
X-Sun-Charset: us-ascii
X-Sun-Content-Lines: 83
A.4. Requirements for Limited Private Address Support
10.10.1.2
|----| IF1=COA1|-------| HAA2 |-----|
| MN1|--------------------------------| FA |---------------| HA2 |
|----| |---------| | |-----|
| IF2=COA2|-------|
|--------------| |
| |
|-----| |
| MN2 | |
|-----| |
10.10.1.2 |
| HAA1
|------|
| HA1 |
|------|
Figure: ??
The above figure X presents a possible scenario for private address
deployment. In this simple private address deployment scenario, only
mobile node home addresses are private addresses. Private addresses
are strictly those defined in RFC1918. The foreign agent FA has publicly
routable addresses on all of it's advertising interfaces. In the above
scenario, FA advertises COA1 and COA2 on two different advertising
interfaces. Similarly both HA2 and HA1 have publicly routable home agent
addresses. COA1 and COA2 are topologically connected with HAA1 and HAA2
respectively, i.e, it's possible that HAA1 is reachable via a physical
interface other than IF1 from the foreign agent, but the tunnels between FA
and HA1 are configured using COA1 and HAA1 addresses.
Also, note that two different mobile-nodes with same private address
are visiting the same FA.
Requirements for the above private address scenario:
Mobile node requirements:
Mobile nodes (MN) intending to use private address mobile-ip
MUST use the 'T' bit and employ reverse tunneling. Mobile node's
private addresses within a given address space MUST be unique.
Thus two mobile nodes belonging to single home agent cannot
have overlapping private addresses. In this scenario the mobile-
nodes always remain outside their home network. If the mobile node
happens to register with multiple home agents simultaneously through
the same foreign agent and through the same link, then the mobile node
MUST use unique home address for each connection to the home agents.
Foreign agent requirements:
All advertising interfaces of the foreign agent MUST have publicly
routable Care Of Addresses (COA). Thus a MN with a private address
visits the foreign agent only in it's publicly routable network.
Foreign agent MUST support reverse tunneling in order to support
private addressed mobile-nodes. (Q: Should it reject a registration
request with turned off 'T' bit from a private addressed MN ? )
For simplicity of implementation, foreign agent may not support
overlapping private addressed mobile nodes per link. Foreign agent
MUST disambiguate among overlapping private addressed mobile nodes
(see figure X) in both direction of packet delivery by using link
layer information like GRE key id, interface identifier and others
listed previously (Appendix section A.2 and A.3). A foreign agent
in absence of route optimization, should make sure that two mobile
nodes visiting the same foreign agent corresponds with each other
through their respective home agents.
If a foreign agent supports reverse tunneling and is able to process
'T' bit in the registration request, then it MUST support the simple
scenario of private address support described in this section.
Home agent requirements:
Home agent address which is used by the mobile node for registration
request MUST be a publicly routable address. Home agent will not
support overlapping private home addresses, thus each private home
address of a mobile node registered with a home agent is unique.
When 'T' bit is set in the registration request from the mobile node,
Home agent MUST recognize and accept registration request from mobile
nodes with private addresses and the home agent should also be able to
assign private addresses as home address from it's address pool.
This does not contravene home agent processing in section 3.8 of
RFC2002-bis.
- Re: [MOBILE-IP] Private addresses Tom Hiller
- [MOBILE-IP] Private addresses Raffaele Pellicciotta