Re: [MOBILE-IP] Private addresses
Tom Hiller <tom.hiller@LUCENT.COM> Fri, 23 June 2000 13:47 UTC
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Original-CC: MOBILE-IP@standards.nortelnetworks.com
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2000 08:47:45 -0500
From: Tom Hiller <tom.hiller@LUCENT.COM>
Subject: Re: [MOBILE-IP] Private addresses
X-To: Raffaele Pellicciotta <pellicciotta@CORITEL.IT>
To: MOBILE-IP@STANDARDS.NORTELNETWORKS.COM
X-Message-ID:
Message-ID: <20140418065037.2560.24678.ARCHIVE@ietfa.amsl.com>
Hi The approach taken in 3GPP2 was to require the FA and HA to have public addresses, and then we keep track of link addresses, home address, and HA address in the FA. By maintaining this triplet of information, the FA can resolve overlapping addresses. We also authenticate the link itself (outside the scope of IETF protocols using a separate key and mobile identifier called and IMSI) -- it is important to authenticate the link with this approach. This discussion occured on the Mobile IP mailing list one year ago. Charles Perkins and Pat Calhoun also have a draft on private addresses that encompasses private HA and FA as well as MN home addresses. Thanks, Tom We did not tackle private HA or FA addresss Thanks Tom Hiller > Raffaele Pellicciotta wrote: > > Hi, I desire to have information about use of private addresses on Mobile > IP!!! > What is its state of art? > Thanks a lot, > Raffaele ----- End Included Message ----- ----- Begin Included Message -----
- Re: [MOBILE-IP] Private addresses Tom Hiller
- [MOBILE-IP] Private addresses Raffaele Pellicciotta