Re: [Mobopts] IRSG Poll forI-D:draft-irtf-mobopts-location-privacy-solutions
"Koodli, Rajeev" <rkoodli@starentnetworks.com> Tue, 17 March 2009 22:24 UTC
Return-Path: <rkoodli@starentnetworks.com>
X-Original-To: mobopts@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mobopts@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 113693A6B23 for <mobopts@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Mar 2009 15:24:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.399, BAYES_00=-2.599, SARE_SUB_RAND_LETTRS4=0.799]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eY6C4a6-8JvJ for <mobopts@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Mar 2009 15:24:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0.starentnetworks.com (mx0.starentnetworks.com [12.38.223.203]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10DF13A67D2 for <mobopts@irtf.org>; Tue, 17 Mar 2009 15:24:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mx0.starentnetworks.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50CC790051 for <mobopts@irtf.org>; Tue, 17 Mar 2009 17:24:48 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mx0.starentnetworks.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mx0.starentnetworks.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 18538-04 for <mobopts@irtf.org>; Tue, 17 Mar 2009 17:24:47 -0500 (EST)
Received: from exchtewks1.starentnetworks.com (exchtewks1.starentnetworks.com [10.2.4.28]) by mx0.starentnetworks.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for <mobopts@irtf.org>; Tue, 17 Mar 2009 17:24:47 -0500 (EST)
Received: from exchtewks3.starentnetworks.com ([10.2.4.31]) by exchtewks1.starentnetworks.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 17 Mar 2009 18:22:27 -0400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 18:22:26 -0400
Message-ID: <4D35478224365146822AE9E3AD4A26660741C348@exchtewks3.starentnetworks.com>
In-Reply-To: <C304DB494AC0C04C87C6A6E2FF5603DB220C9F0127@NDJSSCC01.ndc.nasa.gov>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [Mobopts] IRSG Poll forI-D:draft-irtf-mobopts-location-privacy-solutions
Thread-Index: AcmMoAJrECRqzS1pjkyOYuqkhWO/NwMhdCAQAW723rAAxi0cVwAYORGwATzXH+A=
From: "Koodli, Rajeev" <rkoodli@starentnetworks.com>
To: mobopts@irtf.org
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 17 Mar 2009 22:22:27.0032 (UTC) FILETIME=[DA683580:01C9A74E]
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new 2.2.1 (20041222) at mx0.starentnetworks.com
Subject: Re: [Mobopts] IRSG Poll forI-D:draft-irtf-mobopts-location-privacy-solutions
X-BeenThere: mobopts@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobility Optimizations <mobopts.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/mobopts>, <mailto:mobopts-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/mobopts>
List-Post: <mailto:mobopts@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mobopts-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/mobopts>, <mailto:mobopts-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 22:24:13 -0000
Hi Wes, Thanks for your review, and vote. Please some comments inline: > One substance nit is that the requirements listed in section > 3 lack any associated "rationale" statements. Including some > rationale alongside each requirement is general practice in > formal requirements management. This is just a very basic set of requirements (such as use MIP6 framework, do not alter IPsec etc.) set forth for the solutions. We feel it is fairly self-explanatory, and prefer to refer the reader to a basic understanding of MIP6. > > Another nit is that the document generally phrases the > problem as being to hide the mapping between "the home > address and the care-of address". I believe it should really > be between "the home address and an in-use care-of address", > in order to ease later understanding of the applicability to > monami6, dsmip, or other extensions that the conclusions say > may be in-scope in the future for clarification. > Multiple CoAs may be in-use (in the future), right? If so, the document is equally applicable. > The problem of location privacy is very complex, and the > document does a good job of tracking each concern and clearly > explaining what appears in each relevant header and option > field in the stack so that the impact can be readily > assessed. I appreciated this. Thanks. > > There are some editorial nits, but I believe they're minor > enough that the RFC Editor will fix them. Okay. Regards, -Rajeev > > --------------------------- > Wes Eddy > Network & Systems Architect > Verizon FNS / NASA GRC > Office: (216) 433-6682 > --------------------------- > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: mobopts-bounces@irtf.org > >[mailto:mobopts-bounces@irtf.org] On Behalf Of > >Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com > >Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2009 11:41 PM > >To: irsg@ISI.EDU > >Cc: basavarj.patil@nokia.com; mobopts@irtf.org > >Subject: Re: [Mobopts] IRSG Poll > >forI-D:draft-irtf-mobopts-location-privacy-solutions > > > > > >Hello, > > > >The deadline for the IRSG poll for I-D: > >draft-irtf-mobopts-location-privacy-solutions expired on Feb 26th. > > > >So far we have received one no objection vote. Would like to > >hear from a few other people. > >I am extending the deadline to March 15th. Please respond to > the poll. > > > >Again the choices are: > > > > o 'Ready to publish' -- requires a thorough read and reasonably > > detailed review > > > > o 'Not ready to publish' -- requires a thorough read, > > reasonably detailed review, and actionable comments. > > > > o 'No objection' -- I don't object if this document > > goes forward; > > I've read the document (perhaps quickly); I have some small > > comments which are not show stoppers; I don't have great > > expertise in the area. > > > > o 'Request more time to review' -- a commitment to provide a > > thorough review in a specified period of time. > > > >Rgds, > >-Basavaraj > > > >> > -----Original Message----- > >> > From: mobopts-bounces@irtf.org > >> > [mailto:mobopts-bounces@irtf.org] On Behalf Of > >> > Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com > >> > Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 3:25 PM > >> > To: irsg@isi.edu > >> > Cc: Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com; mobopts@irtf.org > >> > Subject: [Mobopts] IRSG Poll for > >> > I-D:draft-irtf-mobopts-location-privacy-solutions > >> > > >> > > >> > Hello, > >> > > >> > The Mobopts RG I-D: > >> > draft-irtf-mobopts-location-privacy-solutions has completed IRSG > >> > review. > >> > The revised version of the I-D (Rev 12) which incorporates the > >> > comments is now available at: > >> > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-irtf-mobopts-locatio > >> > n-privacy-solu > >> > tions-12.txt. > >> > > >> > Michael Welzl who has performed the IRSG review and the > Mobopts RG > >> > have approved the revised I-D to be progressed for publication. > >> > > >> > The IRSG review is available from the IRTF tracker web page at: > >> > http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/irtf/trac/ticket/24 > >> > > >> > Please consider this email as the start of a two week IRSG > >> poll. The > >> > deadline for this poll is : Feb 26th, 2009. > >> > > >> > Please use one of the poll responses defined below. > >> > The possible poll responses are: > >> > > >> > o 'Ready to publish' -- requires a thorough read and > >reasonably > >> > detailed review > >> > > >> > o 'Not ready to publish' -- requires a thorough read, > >> reasonably > >> > detailed review, and actionable comments. > >> > > >> > o 'No objection' -- I don't object if this document > >> goes forward; > >> > I've read the document (perhaps quickly); I have > some small > >> > comments which are not show stoppers; I don't have great > >> > expertise in the area. > >> > > >> > o 'Request more time to review' -- a commitment to provide a > >> > thorough review in a specified period of time. > >> > > >> > The most relevant rule is that "At least two other IRSG members > >> > (besides the one sponsoring the document) need to vote 'ready to > >> > publish' for the document to move forward." > >> > > >> > Please review and submit your vote. > >> > > >> > -Basavaraj > >> > Document Shepherd for the I-D > >> > > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> > Mobopts mailing list > >> > Mobopts@irtf.org > >> > http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/mobopts > >> > > > > > > >This email and any attachments may contain legally privileged > >and/or confidential information of Starent Networks, Corp. and > >is intended only for the individual or entity named in the > >message. The information transmitted may not be used to > >create or change any contractual obligations of Starent > >Networks, Corp. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or > >other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this > >e-mail and its attachments by persons or entities other than > >the intended recipient is prohibited. If you are not the > >intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately -- by > >replying to this message or by sending an email to > >postmaster@starentnetworks.com -- and destroy all copies of > >this message and any attachments without reading or disclosing > >their contents. Thank you. > >_______________________________________________ > >Mobopts mailing list > >Mobopts@irtf.org > >http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/mobopts > > > _______________________________________________ > Mobopts mailing list > Mobopts@irtf.org > http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/mobopts >
- Re: [Mobopts] IRSG Poll for I-D:draft-irtf-mobopt… Basavaraj.Patil
- Re: [Mobopts] IRSG Poll forI-D:draft-irtf-mobopts… Eddy, Wesley M. (GRC-RCN0)[Verizon]
- Re: [Mobopts] [IRSG] IRSG Poll forI-D:draft-irtf-… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Mobopts] [IRSG] IRSG PollforI-D:draft-irtf-m… QIU Ying
- Re: [Mobopts] IRSG Poll forI-D:draft-irtf-mobopts… QIU Ying
- Re: [Mobopts] IRSG Poll forI-D:draft-irtf-mobopts… Koodli, Rajeev
- Re: [Mobopts] IRSG PollforI-D:draft-irtf-mobopts-… Eddy, Wesley M. (GRC-RCN0)[Verizon]
- Re: [Mobopts] [IRSG] IRSG PollforI-D:draft-irtf-m… Rajeev Koodli
- Re: [Mobopts] [IRSG] IRSG PollforI-D:draft-irtf-m… Basavaraj.Patil