Message-ID: <4718998C.9050409@informatik.haw-hamburg.de>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 13:48:28 +0200
From: "Thomas C. Schmidt" <schmidt@informatik.haw-hamburg.de>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Rajeev Koodli <rajeev.koodli@nokia.com>
Subject: Re: [Mobopts] RG update
References: <C33D2A1D.1CC1C%rajeev.koodli@nokia.com>
In-Reply-To: <C33D2A1D.1CC1C%rajeev.koodli@nokia.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: "mobopts@irtf.org" <mobopts@irtf.org>
Precedence: list
Errors-To: mobopts-bounces@irtf.org

Hi all,

Rajeev Koodli wrote:
>=20
> 3. The multicast and mobility problem statement has received some good
> reviews already, and will perhaps be ready for RG LC soon.
> (draft-irtf-mobopts-mmcastv6-ps-01.txt)
>=20
We are currently preparing a major revision and very much solicit any=20
feedback: so, if you have some comments in the queue, please let us know=20
asap.

> The RG will continue work on these to publish them.
> In the meanwhile, we need to look at what other topics we need to be
> addressing.. We have a unique forum to look at wireless/mobility proble=
ms in
> general as they relate to Internet. I encourage folks to make use of th=
is.
>=20
A suggestion would be to look closer at the mobile multicast source=20
problem, particularly solutions and their implication for infrastructure=20
  capabilities. This relates to the more general questions of

   * do we need to change MIPv6 stacks for mobile multicast support and h=
ow?
   * do we need to require properties/changes from infrastructural=20
entities (ARs, MAPs, Mcast-Routers, Tunnel Gateways) to support=20
multicast source mobility and which?

> As we plan for the Vancouver meeting, should we have a mini-workshop on
> mobility related topics? What topics are interesting? Does wireless lin=
k
> virtualization make sense? Is there interest in reviewing GENI wireless
> models and contributing to them? Any other?
>=20
A discussion of methodical issues for experimental and simulation=20
analysis could be of interest: This would go along with Geni wireless=20
models, but could include simulation models / tools / data input, as well=
.

We could offer a presentation on Internet topology measurement data=20
(e.g., comparing Caida & Dimes) and tools.

Regards,

thomas
--=20

=B0 Prof. Dr. Thomas C. Schmidt
=B0 HAW Hamburg, Dept. Informatik
=B0 University of Applied Sciences
=B0 Berliner Tor 7, D 20099 Hamburg
=B0 Germany, Fon: +49-40-42875-8157
=B0 http://www.informatik.haw-hamburg.de/~schmidt

_______________________________________________
Mobopts mailing list
Mobopts@irtf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mobopts