Re: [Mobopts] Same MPA server for 2 access networks

My question is more about a interworking scenario, more specifically  
inter-technology / intra-domain handover.
Like a 3G-Wifi interworking scenario... we need have these agents in  
each access network but we can have a centralized MPA server, right?

Carlos Rodrigues

----- Original Message -----
From: "Ashutosh Dutta" <adutta@research.telcordia.com>
To: "Carlos Rodrigues" <cmjr@iol.pt>
Cc: <mobopts@irtf.org>
Sent: Monday, April 20, 2009 6:52 PM
Subject: Re: [Mobopts] Same MPA server for 2 access networks

> Carlos,
>        As I just replied to your personal email to me, you can have  
> an AA (Authentication Agent) and CA (Configuration Agent) that are  
> two logical components of an MPA server in the core of the IMS  
> network. These two functions of course can coexist on the same  
> physical box if that is what you are asking for.
>
> Thanks
> Ashutosh
>
> Carlos Rodrigues wrote:
>> These agents need to stay with access network but I can have a  
>> centralized MPA server in the edge of IMS core, no?
>>
>> It is like DNS... we don't have several DNS servers to access to  
>> the Internet. It is done relay...
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Carlos Rodrigues (Computer Science BSc student)
>> ESTG - IPL
>> Leiria, Portugal
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Ashutosh Dutta" <adutta@research.telcordia.com>
>> To: "Carlos Rodrigues" <cmjr@iol.pt>
>> Cc: <mobopts@irtf.org>
>> Sent: Monday, April 06, 2009 7:55 PM
>> Subject: Re: [Mobopts] Same MPA server for 2 access networks
>>
>>
>>> Carlos,
>>>         Let me repeat some of what I have said earlier to you.
>>> MPA server has several logical components, such as Authentication  
>>> Agent, Configuration Agent, Buffering Agent, Tunneling agent. Some  
>>> of these components could be aggregated for each access network,  
>>> such as Authentication Agent, and Configuration Agent. However,  
>>> part of Configuration Agent needs to stay with each access network  
>>> (e.g., DHCP relay). Buffering Agent and Tunneling Agent usually  
>>> stay at the edges with each access network.
>>>
>>> Thus, it is a design decision as to how you want to split the  
>>> functionality of the MPA server.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Ashutosh
>>>
>>>
>>> Carlos Rodrigues wrote:
>>>> Hi!
>>>>
>>>> I have question about the number of MPA servers necessary in a  
>>>> interworking scenario.
>>>> If I have a scenario with 2 access networks (with different  
>>>> technologies), will need two CA, two AA and two tunneling agents  
>>>> and buffering agents if perform handover from both ways (A to B  
>>>> and B to A), right?
>>>>
>>>> First, I'm trying understand why (can give some tips?);
>>>> Second, it's not possible aggregate these 2 MPA server in a  
>>>> single entity? In a intra domain scenario makes sense.
>>>>
>>>> All help or support will be very helpful.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Carlos Rodrigues (Computer Science BSc student)
>>>> ESTG - IPL
>>>> Leiria, Portugal
>>>>
>>>> ________________________________________________________________________________ Descubra as Soluções de Financiamento  
>>>> Cetelem.
>>>> Saiba mais em: http://www.iol.pt/correio/rodape.php?dst=0901272
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Mobopts mailing list
>>>> Mobopts@irtf.org
>>>> http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/mobopts
>>>
>>
>> ________________________________________________________________________________ ANTECIPE A DEVOLUÇÃO DO SEU IRS e receba já o seu  
>> dinheiro...
>> I.R.Yes! da Capital Mais
>> http://www.iol.pt/correio/rodape.php?dst=0803281
>> _______________________________________________
>> Mobopts mailing list
>> Mobopts@irtf.org
>> http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/mobopts
>

________________________________________________________________________________
Financiamentos até €50.000. Simule já!
Saiba mais em: http://www.iol.pt/correio/rodape.php?dst=0901273