[Mobopts] Re: L2 abstractions draft
"Soohong Daniel Park" <soohongp@gmail.com> Tue, 26 September 2006 11:45 UTC
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GSBNm-0000lQ-AO; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 07:45:50 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GSBNk-0000lJ-P9 for mobopts@irtf.org; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 07:45:48 -0400
Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com ([66.249.82.226]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GSBNj-0005qg-Is for mobopts@irtf.org; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 07:45:48 -0400
Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id t13so2269327wxc for <mobopts@irtf.org>; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 04:45:47 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=ts+C5z+PXZC6D824/MfYMppNYcnE8U95kvz3wxin/aWEERBWTGdmxomdVM5Yj8qnoTIjPNKFxljIa0poPE+9QBecazhDvNZAmeJEJuKy1R2tmrfVAbX5WAxwTrpeEQYQIiRgcqRWD9odDHimeVnjYAcEOwvW9Kgkn8q//MCjnW4=
Received: by 10.70.109.9 with SMTP id h9mr573298wxc; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 04:45:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.70.27.14 with HTTP; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 04:45:47 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <f7c7d76e0609260445g2f36ebcci99b5283082dba10b@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 20:45:47 +0900
From: Soohong Daniel Park <soohongp@gmail.com>
To: mobopts@irtf.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 79899194edc4f33a41f49410777972f8
Subject: [Mobopts] Re: L2 abstractions draft
X-BeenThere: mobopts@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mobility Optimizations <mobopts.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mobopts>, <mailto:mobopts-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:mobopts@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mobopts-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mobopts>, <mailto:mobopts-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: mobopts-bounces@irtf.org
Rajeev, After glancing at this draft, I am not sure whether authors are referring what's going on in IEEE 802.21 working group. 802.21 begun their efforts on the L2 facility to support IP mobility from 2004 (in face study group is more early than 2004). There are already lot of L2 primitives which are well defined and categorized in there. To me, this draft seems really duplicated with 21 spec. Why we need several documents for the same way ? I am willing to be a review on this document in conjunction with IEEE 802.21 folks. But, before that, we should clarify the relationship between this draft and IEEE 802.21 spec. Am I missing anything ? if yes, please let me know... -- Daniel (Soohong Daniel Park) Mobile Convergence Laboratory, SAMSUNG Electronics. _______________________________________________ Mobopts mailing list Mobopts@irtf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mobopts
- [Mobopts] L2 abstractions draft rajeev.koodli
- [Mobopts] Re: L2 abstractions draft Soohong Daniel Park
- AW: [Mobopts] Re: L2 abstractions draft Tschofenig, Hannes
- Re: [Mobopts] Re: L2 abstractions draft Soohong Daniel Park
- Re: [Mobopts] Re: L2 abstractions draft Koshiro MITSUYA
- Re: [Mobopts] Re: L2 abstractions draft Soohong Daniel Park
- Re: [Mobopts] Re: L2 abstractions draft Koshiro MITSUYA
- Re: [Mobopts] Re: L2 abstractions draft Rajeev Koodli
- Re: [Mobopts] Re: L2 abstractions draft Soohong Daniel Park