Return-Path: <lars@eggert.org>
X-Original-To: mod-discuss@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: mod-discuss@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90AE25546917
	for <mod-discuss@mail2.ietf.org>; Sun, 17 Aug 2025 23:10:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5
	tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
	DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1,
	RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001,
	RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
	header.d=eggert.org
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31])
	by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id Am5KooV4CYkr for <mod-discuss@mail2.ietf.org>;
	Sun, 17 Aug 2025 23:10:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.eggert.org (mail.eggert.org [91.190.195.94])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
	 key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256)
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C16155468FA
	for <mod-discuss@ietf.org>; Sun, 17 Aug 2025 23:10:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Mailerdaemon)
 with ESMTPSA id 1B79E8012F;
	Mon, 18 Aug 2025 09:10:20 +0300 (EEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=eggert.org; s=dkim;
	t=1755497420; h=from:subject:date:message-id:to:cc:mime-version:content-type:
	 in-reply-to:references; bh=GGvoiXEw/d7SjuCSsxGAJtwWT/lo3fAw/0NeeacUrw4=;
	b=oi3+rBIVFJRgqDRDDmNKpf9PZVnJ/xCn3VX2Taxsk8hxGXhAx4MlRQNRdhybjDR/7cW+AL
	4+e/Zma/+E1jbxUfwi6lHiZIaJgCrYH0gvrcOkmAnm0ouAWVoRFHgwnz0VrkgEplKa2CCa
	AbBm19QdBuKCxZFEg3LWAbyxTZfNQFuEktZvr0LxwEYq9RgH4GIgCn//7jhat1V6FJ+S5+
	6HKDAP/PzIxycPvQHNo+pkzBWmeNX0nenyFdn2MgBiqWk+EAz1uEl6SKS/Yl/qxPjPKV4b
	aq6VPJaMeG1bvt47mhR1aFbrywlhYVLv7d54IpKi9pSuH/Uh+HvEZvOYOQiXzg==
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
	boundary="Apple-Mail=_F5B7DDDC-29DD-4159-A3B4-7278DAED419E";
	protocol="application/pgp-signature";
	micalg=pgp-sha512
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3826.700.81\))
From: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
In-Reply-To: <4D307285-4A6C-4A3D-BEEC-557330B362B0@episteme.net>
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2025 09:10:20 +0300
Message-Id: <76011393-BA64-474F-B6EC-1EB0DEB5B541@eggert.org>
References: <4D307285-4A6C-4A3D-BEEC-557330B362B0@episteme.net>
To: Pete Resnick <resnick=40episteme.net@dmarc.ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3826.700.81)
X-Last-TLS-Session-Version: TLSv1.2
Message-ID-Hash: BEXNG5VVNGZHRJJ5GY3L2SBNIVAHJQWS
X-Message-ID-Hash: BEXNG5VVNGZHRJJ5GY3L2SBNIVAHJQWS
X-MailFrom: lars@eggert.org
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency;
 loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-mod-discuss.ietf.org-0;
 header-match-mod-discuss.ietf.org-1; header-match-mod-discuss.ietf.org-2;
 header-match-mod-discuss.ietf.org-3; header-match-mod-discuss.ietf.org-4;
 header-match-mod-discuss.ietf.org-5; header-match-mod-discuss.ietf.org-6;
 nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size;
 news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: mod-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: =?utf-8?q?=5BMod-discuss=5D_Re=3A_Minor_edits_for_-10?=
List-Id: Discussion list for IETF moderation policies and practices
 <mod-discuss.ietf.org>
Archived-At: 
 <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mod-discuss/3ZbNgSJPdbmC9fDV0vATHA0_pKo>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mod-discuss>
List-Help: <mailto:mod-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:mod-discuss-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:mod-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:mod-discuss-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:mod-discuss-leave@ietf.org>


--Apple-Mail=_F5B7DDDC-29DD-4159-A3B4-7278DAED419E
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=utf-8

Thanks, see =
https://github.com/larseggert/draft-ietf-modpod-group-processes/pull/149

> On Aug 18, 2025, at 01:55, Pete Resnick =
<resnick=3D40episteme.net@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>=20
> I am quite satisfied with -10, including the text from PR 147. I think =
this resolves the difference between the two positions quite reasonably.
> Just two minor (though substantive) things I think we probably want to =
handle:
>     =E2=80=A2 In the first bullet of the goals list in 1.2 it says, =
"without regard to one's position or previous contributions", and in the =
last sentence of the section it says, "regardless of their position or =
past contributions". There are two ambiguities in there that I think =
leave open the possibility for confusion. I suggest replacing them, =
respectively, with "without regard to one's role in the ITEF or previous =
technical contributions" and "regardless of their role in the IETF or =
past technical contributions." That is, the word "position" refers to a =
leadership role or lack thereof, not a position taken on an issue, and =
the word "contributions" refers to technical contributions and not, for =
example, past contributions that consisted of uncivil behavior, which =
can certainly be taken into account when making judgements about =
moderations that may be needed.
>     =E2=80=A2 In section 4.1, it says that decisions "can be appealed =
to the IESG by anyone, per [RFC2026]" and "to the IAB as described in =
[RFC2026]". The reference to simply "[RFC2026]" is not quite specific =
enough. It could be that you mean "using the same procedures in section =
6.5.2 and 6.5.4 of [RFC 2026]", but I think you need to be clear on this =
either way. People often get confused about whether 6.5.1 or 6.5.2 is =
the correct procedure for a given circumstance, or whether something =
else should be specified. I know in the case of RFC 7776 (Ombudsteam), =
we only specified using the procedures of 6.5.4 and otherwise specified =
everything in the RFC itself because it wasn't like other appeals =
processes.
> I am fine if these are simply taken as early WGLC comments and =
addressed after WGLC.
> pr
> --
> Pete Resnick https://www.episteme.net/
> All connections to the world are tenuous at best
> _______________________________________________
> Mod-discuss mailing list -- mod-discuss@ietf.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to mod-discuss-leave@ietf.org


--Apple-Mail=_F5B7DDDC-29DD-4159-A3B4-7278DAED419E
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=signature.asc
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature;
	name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=fqWz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Apple-Mail=_F5B7DDDC-29DD-4159-A3B4-7278DAED419E--

