Re: [Model-t] Next steps from Tuesday's breakfast meeting

[Stephen Farrell <[e-mail]>]

Hiya,

On 22/11/2019 00:14, Melinda Shore wrote:
> Thanks, all, for the notes.  One thing I don't think we've discussed
> is the ultimate disposition of the work.  I'm not clear whether this
> is going to be progressed as an IETF consensus document, an IAB
> document, ... ?  

I think, in the success-case, we'd be producing:

- a short (1-2 page of content) draft that we offer to the
IETF as a possible update to BCP72

- as many documents as are relevant that are explanatory
or background materials related to the above. Those might
or might not be I-Ds/RFCs or other kinds of document.

> I'm also not clear on the process for synthesizing
> these individual drafts into a coherent statement and it may be
> worth spending a few minutes on that, particularly in the case of
> drafts with overlapping subject matter.

I don't think we can know how to handle that until later,
as it'll depend on the work that gets done and from which
we may be trying to select/generalise a few short nuggets
of wisdom.

As I said at the brekkie, a lot of the above seems to me
to follow from the target here being something that could
be a credible update to BCP72 understandable and consumable
for any random IETF participant developing or updating
some protocol.

Cheers,
S.

> 
> Melinda
> 
>