Re: Proposal for important new object

Steven Waldbusser <waldbusser+@cmu.edu> Wed, 23 February 1994 18:54 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa09321; 23 Feb 94 13:54 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa09317; 23 Feb 94 13:54 EST
Received: from apache.telebit.com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa15579; 23 Feb 94 13:54 EST
Received: from america.Sunnyvale.Telebit.CO (america-bb.sunnyvale.telebit.com) by apache.telebit.com (4.1/SMI-4.1/Telebit-Apache-Brent-940210) id AA10436 to ietf-archive@cnri.reston.va.us; Wed, 23 Feb 94 10:47:56 PST
Received: from apache.telebit.com by america.Sunnyvale.Telebit.COM (4.0/america.telebit.com-DBC-930718) id AA18387 to modemmgt@apache.Sunnyvale.Telebit.COM; Wed, 23 Feb 94 10:47:53 PST
Received: from po4.andrew.cmu.edu by apache.telebit.com (4.1/SMI-4.1/Telebit-Apache-Brent-940210) id AA10433 to Mark.S.Lewis@Telebit.COM; Wed, 23 Feb 94 10:47:49 PST
Received: from localhost (postman@localhost) by po4.andrew.cmu.edu (8.6.4/8.6.4) id NAA00937; Wed, 23 Feb 1994 13:47:44 -0500
Received: via switchmail; Wed, 23 Feb 1994 13:47:42 -0500 (EST)
Received: from zeus.net.cmu.edu via qmail ID </afs/andrew.cmu.edu/service/mailqs/testq0/QF.chOuFvq00WArA0Nitw>; Wed, 23 Feb 1994 13:46:20 -0500 (EST)
Received: from zeus.net.cmu.edu via qmail ID </afs/andrew.cmu.edu/usr5/sw0l/.Outgoing/QF.0hOuFuu00WArJH33tR>; Wed, 23 Feb 1994 13:46:19 -0500 (EST)
Received: from Messages.8.5.N.CUILIB.3.45.SNAP.NOT.LINKED.zeus.net.cmu.edu.sun4m.412 via MS.5.6.zeus.net.cmu.edu.sun4c_411; Wed, 23 Feb 1994 13:46:16 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <IhOuFs600WArJH33hZ@andrew.cmu.edu>
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 1994 13:46:16 -0500 (EST)
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Steven Waldbusser <waldbusser+@cmu.edu>
To: Mark.S.Lewis@telebit.com
Subject: Re: Proposal for important new object
Cc: modemmgt@telebit.com
In-Reply-To: <9402221902.AA02079@america.Sunnyvale.Telebit.COM>
References: <9402221902.AA02079@america.Sunnyvale.Telebit.COM>

Excerpts from modemmgt: 22-Feb-94 Re: Proposal for important .. Mark S.
Lewis@Telebit.CO (1916*)

> Is it reasonable to put the modem `on-hook'?  Perhaps we just allow
> management to `busied-out' and `reset'.  We rely on `reset' to put the
> modem back in it's operational state.

I think sometimes you want to hang up the call and keep the modem state,
and sometimes you want to hang up the call and reset the modem state. 
Hence the two actions.


Steve