Re: Ballot: Requirements for IP Version 4 Routers to Proposed Standard

Harald.T.Alvestrand@uninett.no Wed, 03 May 1995 13:52 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa02853; 3 May 95 9:52 EDT
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa02847; 3 May 95 9:52 EDT
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa06911; 3 May 95 9:52 EDT
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa02827; 3 May 95 9:52 EDT
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa02821; 3 May 95 9:52 EDT
Received: from domen.uninett.no by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa06898; 3 May 95 9:52 EDT
Received: from dale.uninett.no by domen.uninett.no with SMTP (PP) id <13784-0@domen.uninett.no>; Wed, 3 May 1995 15:53:05 +0200
Received: from dale.uninett.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dale.uninett.no (8.6.9/8.6.9) with ESMTP id JAA04651; Wed, 3 May 1995 09:53:01 -0400
Message-Id: <199505031353.JAA04651@dale.uninett.no>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.5.3 12/28/94
X-Orig-Sender: iesg-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Harald.T.Alvestrand@uninett.no
To: IESG Secretary <iesg-secretary@CNRI.Reston.VA.US>
cc: Internet Engineering Steering Group <iesg@CNRI.Reston.VA.US>
Subject: Re: Ballot: Requirements for IP Version 4 Routers to Proposed Standard
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 02 May 1995 14:44:24 EDT." <9505021444.aa08864@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Wed, 03 May 1995 09:53:00 -0400
X-Orig-Sender: hta@dale.uninett.no

Is it correct to return the vote to the whole list, or just to
the secretary?
Should the vote be sent by a specific date, or just before the
next telechat?
New kid on the block...


              Yes    No-Objection  Discuss *  Abstain

Harald Alvestrand   [   ]     [   ]       [   ]      [ X ]

             Harald A