Re: Experimental RFC-to-be submission
IESG Secretary <iesg-secretary@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US> Mon, 01 May 1995 19:30 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa08472; 1 May 95 15:30 EDT
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa08468; 1 May 95 15:30 EDT
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa13938; 1 May 95 15:30 EDT
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa08460; 1 May 95 15:30 EDT
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa08452; 1 May 95 15:30 EDT
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa13929; 1 May 95 15:30 EDT
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa08443; 1 May 95 15:30 EDT
To: rfc-editor@isi.edu
cc: iesg@CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Subject: Re: Experimental RFC-to-be submission
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 25 Apr 95 08:14:44 PDT." <199504251514.AA08825@akamai.isi.edu>
X-Orig-Sender: iesg-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: IESG Secretary <iesg-secretary@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US>
Date: Mon, 01 May 1995 15:30:17 -0400
X-Orig-Sender: scoya@CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Message-ID: <9505011530.aa08443@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US>
Joyce and --jon,
I would like to ask for an extension to the timeout period for the
following RFC submissions that were sent to the IESG for comment:
Internet Stream Protocol Version 2 (ST2) V2 - Experimental
<draft-ietf-st2-spec-04.txt>
Common DNS Operational and Configuration Errors - Informational
The Meta-Management MIB (SNMPv1) Network Topology and Set of Agents
- Experimental
ISO Transport Class 2 Non-use of Explicit Flow Control over TCP
RFC1006 extension - Informational
These documents were sent just before the IESG retreat, and I would
like the IESG to have more time to review and comment.
Thanks.
Steve
- Re: Experimental RFC-to-be submission jkrey
- Re: Experimental RFC-to-be submission IESG Secretary
- Re: Experimental RFC-to-be submission postel