Re: FYI: What new MIB would look like

"Mark S. Lewis" <mlewis@telebit.com> Sat, 19 February 1994 01:09 UTC

Date: Fri, 18 Feb 1994 17:02:53 -0800
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: "Mark S. Lewis" <mlewis@telebit.com>
Message-Id: <9402190102.AA28963@america.Sunnyvale.Telebit.COM>
To: waldbusser+@cmu.edu
Cc: modemmgt@telebit.com
In-Reply-To: <whMxrLS00WAr5H32Nz@andrew.cmu.edu> (waldbusser+@CMU.EDU)
Subject: Re: FYI: What new MIB would look like
Reply-To: Mark.S.Lewis@telebit.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"

>>>>> On Thu, 17 Feb 1994 16:12:55 -0500 (EST), Steven Waldbusser <waldbusser+@CMU.EDU> said:

> If there are no strong objections to the items I identified that we've
> reached concensus on, and we are to reach concensus on my proposals,
> this is what the resulting MIB would look like.  The change bars are
> with respect to the last Internet-Draft.

> Comments?

> Steve

I look at it briefly and liked it.  The only big thing I don't like is
mdmCCConnectionFailReason--it's a mess.  I still think we should
duplicate V.58 callCleared.  What wrong with that plan?

... Mark

==========--------------       Mark S. Lewis      ----------==========
Mark.S.Lewis@Telebit.com       Telebit Corp.      Voice (408) 745-3232

FYI: What new MIB would look like Steven Waldbusser
Re: FYI: What new MIB would look like Mark S. Lewis
Re: FYI: What new MIB would look like Jim Barnes