Re: Procedural Question

"Jeffrey I. Schiller" <jis@mit.edu> Wed, 03 May 1995 01:18 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa13425; 2 May 95 21:18 EDT
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa13421; 2 May 95 21:18 EDT
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa26217; 2 May 95 21:18 EDT
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa13414; 2 May 95 21:18 EDT
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa13410; 2 May 95 21:18 EDT
Received: from BIG-SCREW.MIT.EDU by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa26212; 2 May 95 21:18 EDT
Received: by big-screw id AA09850; Tue, 2 May 95 21:19:12 -0400
Message-Id: <abcc8a6c01021004ddbe@[18.72.0.238]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Tue, 2 May 1995 21:19:14 -0400
To: kasten@ftp.com
X-Orig-Sender: iesg-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: "Jeffrey I. Schiller" <jis@mit.edu>
Subject: Re: Procedural Question
Cc: iesg@CNRI.Reston.VA.US

At 17:46 5/2/95, Frank Kastenholz wrote:
>Hi
>
>I've read through Ran Atkinson's documents that he submitted (or so I
>am under the impression...) and Phil Rogaway's objections and have a fairly
>large set of comments. What do I do with the comments? Send them directly
>to Ran or to Jeff Schiller (or someone else) for ....?

You can send them to Ran and myself. I also wouldn't mind a telephone chat
as well.

                                -Jeff